Topic
Technology Assisted Review
115 published works
ComplexDiscovery
Federal magistrate judge treats LinkedIn’s Relativity aiR workflow as TAR
By Rob Robinson
Editor’s Note: A federal magistrate judge has given litigators their first close look at how a court handles generative artificial intelligence making final responsiveness calls, and the answer required no…
Legal IT Insider
From TAR TO HAR Report: Are GenAI Discovery Tools Ready for Forensic Scrutiny? Read it here now!
By Caroline Hill - Editor-in-Chief
As generative AI moves from experimentation to production use in live discovery matters (Human AI-Assisted Review or HAR), the legal profession faces a question it has been collectively reluctant to…
Proteus Discovery Group Blog
The Case for Traditional Review in a Tech-Driven World
By sarah-barthproteusdiscovery-com-sarah-barth
Technology Assisted Review (TAR), or some variation of it, has been dominating the document review conversation for nearly a decade now. From TAR to Continuous Active Learning (CAL) to the…
eDiscovery Today Blog
GenAI and TAR: Competitive or Complementary?: eDiscovery Best Practices
By Doug Austin
Are GenAI and TAR competitive or complementary in eDiscovery? Greg Moreman of Level Legal answers that question in this article! The post GenAI and TAR: Competitive or Complementary?: eDiscovery Best…
eDiscovery Today Blog
In An Epic of Dysfunctional Discovery, Court Suggests TAR: eDiscovery Case Law
By Doug Austin
In Everlast Roofing, Inc. v. Wilson, Pennsylvania Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson calling this litigation “a case which threatens to become an epic of dysfunctional discovery”, recommended that “the parties' ESI protocol should…
In-House Ops
TAR to HAR: How LLMs Are Ushering in Legal 3.0
By Tom Gricks
OpenText’s Tom Gricks reflects on the evolution of technology- assisted review and how large language models are redefining speed, accuracy, and strategy in legal discovery
eDiscovery Today Blog
Six Reasons Why Gen AI May Replace TAR…Someday: Artificial Intelligence Trends
By Doug Austin
Will generative AI replace technology assisted review (TAR)? Here are six reasons why gen AI may replace TAR…someday. The post Six Reasons Why Gen AI May Replace TAR…Someday: Artificial Intelligence…
eDiscovery Today Blog
Defendants May Use TAR to Reduce Their Discovery Burden, Court Rules: eDiscovery Case Law
By Doug Austin
In Berger v. Graf Acquisition, LLC, Vice Chancellor Lori W. Will rejected the plaintiff’s insistence that the defendants conduct a manual review, stating: “the defendants may use TAR to reduce…
eDiscovery Today Blog
Good Faith Attempt to Use the Search Term Protocol Required for TAR, Court Rules: eDiscovery Case Law
By Doug Austin
In Edgar v. Teva A Pharm. Indus., Ltd., Kansas Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James entered the parties’ proposed ESI Protocol with Plaintiffs’ proposed Technology Assisted Review (“TAR”) provision that first…
ComplexDiscovery
eDiscovery Review in Transition: Manual Review, TAR, and the Role of AI
By Rob Robinson
Editor’s Note: This article is essential for cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals navigating the complexities of legal document review. With the rapid advancements in AI technology, understanding the benefits…