Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

SDGa – Attorneys Practicing in Southern District Not “Debt Relief Agencies” Under BAPCPA

By Sunghee Sohn on December 12, 2005
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

11 U.S.C. §101(12A); Debt Relief Agencies; Attorneys
In re Attorneys at Law and Debt Relief Agencies, 322 B.R. 66 (Bankr. S.D.Ga. October 17, 2006) (Davis)
Although the language defining the term “debt relief agencies” in §101(12A) was broad enough to cover attorneys, the court held that members of the bar of the court, or attorneys admitted pro hac vice, are not covered by the provisions of the Code regulating debt relief agencies.

  • Posted in:
    Bankruptcy
  • Blog:
    Georgia Bankruptcy Blog
  • Organization:
    The Law Office of Scott B. Riddle
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo