Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Land Grab: Proposed New Jersey State Highway Access Rules Seek to Require Access Permits for most County and Local Roads

By Ted Zangari on November 21, 2006
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Assemblyman John F. McKeon (D-27th District) has introduced a bill in the New Jersey State Assembly—A-3640—which proposes amendments to the New Jersey State Highway Management Act, N.J.S.A. 27:7-1, et seq., that will expand the New Jersey Department of Transportation’s access permit purview to include the construction and maintenance of a driveway or public street or highway connecting “to a county or local road if the development on the county or local road will generate 200 or more new vehicle trips during any peak hour onto a State highway, whether or not that development has direct access to a State highway.” At first glance, this expansion of NJDOT’s permitting powers appears to be reasonable: it will remedy situations where a large-scale development is located in close proximity to and directly affects a state highway, but nonetheless avoids access permit review because its actual vehicle access is via a county or local connector road. Upon closer inspection, however, it is clear that the expansion is overly broad and could be used to require an access permit for a development on any local or county road, no matter how far removed from a state highway. For example, a development may be far removed from a state highway, but because various local and/or county roads carry traffic from the development to the same state highway, and the development creates, in the aggregate, 200 new vehicle trips on that state highway, an access permit will be required. Also, an access permit may be required if such a development creates, in the aggregate, 200 new vehicle trips on more than one state highway. It is incumbent upon private developers and their trade organizations to contact their legislators regarding A-3640 in an effort to define NJDOT’s access permit powers more narrowly. A-3640 was introduced and referred to the Assembly Transportation and Public Works Committee on November 9, 2006. – by Peter Flannery, Esq., Sills Cummis Epstein & Gross CLICK HERE TO VIEW A-3640

Photo of Ted Zangari Ted Zangari

Ted Zangari is a Member of Sills Cummis & Gross and is a Chair of the Firm’s Real Estate Department.  Mr. Zangari also chairs the Firm’s Redevelopment Law Practice and its Government Relations and Public Policy Practice.

Read more about Ted ZangariEmail
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    RedevelopNJ
  • Organization:
    Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo