Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

8th Circuit Upholds Gross Receipts Taxes for Cell Phones

By Peter Tannenwald on July 25, 2008
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On July 3, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit upheld the application of telephone gross receipts taxes on cellphone companies (Cities of Jefferson City and Springfield, Missouri vs. Cingular Wireless et al., case No.  7-2884).  The cellphone companies claimed that they were providing “Commercial Mobile Radio Services,” and that term does not appear in ordinances imposing a tax on “telephone” and “telephonic” services.

After dodging numerous procedural obstacles, the Court said that cellphones are used to make telephone calls, the cellphone companies market them for use in making telephone calls, and most users think that their cellphones are intended to be used to make telephone calls.  In other words, it if looks like a telephone, walks like a telephone, and quacks like a telephone, it must be a telephone.  The fact that CMRS services may be treated differently from wireline services in other regulatory areas does not mean that cellphone service is not subject to taxes on telephone services.

Photo of Peter Tannenwald Peter Tannenwald

Peter Tannenwald joined Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC, as a Member, after a 40-year career which included one of Washington’s 10 largest law firms, where he was a partner, and more recently as a named principal of Irwin, Campbell & Tannenwald, P.C. In…

Peter Tannenwald joined Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC, as a Member, after a 40-year career which included one of Washington’s 10 largest law firms, where he was a partner, and more recently as a named principal of Irwin, Campbell & Tannenwald, P.C. In addition to a broad range of radio and television broadcast station groups and individual station owners and common carrier and wireless clients in both regulatory and transactional matters, he has represented inventors and developers of new technologies and has helped implement several such technologies, including wireless auditory assistance devices for persons with hearing loss, the use of AM broadcast stations for power utility load management, visual captions on television broadcasts, the Interactive Video and Data Service, compatibility of cellphones and hearing aids, and most recently combining television broadcast and broadband services in the same spectrum.

Read more about Peter TannenwaldEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    CommLawBlog
  • Organization:
    Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo