Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Look before leaping — read the condo rules first!

By Chris Jaglowitz on November 20, 2008
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a recent entry on the Toronto Neighbourhoods and Real Estate blog Move Smartly, lawyer Rachel Loizos offers some wise advice for prospective condo purchasers:   “Before you commit to purchasing a condo unit, make sure you have reviewed the rules.”

She then lists the rules that most commonly affect purchasers and goes on to say:

The cost for non-compliance can be high as the condo corporation has the right to obtain a court order to force you to comply. You may also get stuck with their legal costs in the matter.

It is worth emphasizing that those legal costs can and often do reach the tens of thousands of dollars.   In the recent case of Italiano v. TSCC 1507 (summarized here), the condo successfully pursued a unit owner for violating the noise and nuisance provisions in the condo declaration and rules.  In the end, the at-fault unit owner was ordered to pay over $80,000 in legal costs to the condo corporation.   This was on top of what the owner had to pay his own lawyer.    Ouch!

Purchasers who don’t carefully examine the condominium declaration and rules before buying are taking an enormous risk.

  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Ontario Condo Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Gardiner Miller Arnold LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo