Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Starbucks Learns the “Tip Drill” the Hard Way

By Labor & Employment on January 14, 2009
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Under California Labor Code section 351, tips are the “sole property” of the employees for whom they are left. As such, “employers” may not “collect, take, or receive” employee tips.

The issue in this case was who is the “employer” for purposes of section 351? At Starbucks, “shift supervisors” shared tips with other baristas. A Superior Court Judge in San Diego decided that the shift supervisors were not entitled to the tips at issue because they are “supervisor employers” for the purposes § 351. He ordered Starbucks to pay $100 million in back tips and interest to the non-supervisor baristas who shared the tips with their shift supervisor baristas. It should be noted that the shift supervisors worked side-by-side with the non-supervisor baristas performing many of the same tasks.

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Organization:
    Weintraub Tobin

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo