Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

The Lake Erie Shoreline, Landowner Rights, and the Public Trust – Round 2

By Hannah M. Arenstam on September 9, 2009
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In December 2007, a Lake County Common Pleas Court judge issued a landmark decision holding, among other things, that an owner of real estate that touches Lake Erie owns title extending as far as the water’s edge. State ex rel. Merrill v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources (2007), Lake County Common Pleas Case No. 04CV001080. Lake County is one of eight Ohio counties which contain Lake Erie shoreline.

On August 21, 2009, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Appellate District affirmed that holding in State ex rel. Merrill v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, 2009-Ohio-4256. In particular, the Court of Appeals determined “that the waters and submerged bed of Lake Erie when under such waters is controlled by the state and held in public trust, while the littoral owner takes fee only to the water’s edge.” 2009-Ohio-4256 at ¶129. The Court of Appeals reasoned that “[t]he water’s edge provides a readily discernible boundary for both the public and littoral landowners.” 2009-Ohio-4256 at ¶128. The actual water’s edge, or shoreline, is the line of contact of a body of water and the land between the high and low water marks. 2009-Ohio-4256 at ¶¶97 and 127. 

 

In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals reviewed appeals by environmental organizations representing members who make recreational use of the shores of Lake Erie, and cross-appeals by individual landowners and a non-profit corporation representing owners of littoral property on Lake Erie. In an interesting twist, the Court of Appeals found that the attorney general lacked the authority to pursue an appeal on his own behalf and ordered the state of Ohio’s assignments of error and briefs stricken.

 

The Court of Appeals did vacate that part of the trial court’s decision whereby the trial court attempted to reform any deed granting to its owner land extending lakeward of the water’s edge. The Court of Appeals found the issue of reforming the deeds was not before the trial court and, therefore, the parties had not been afforded the opportunity to argue their positions. 2009-Ohio-4256 at ¶103.

 

Any party wishing to appeal the decision must file a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court within 45 days from the entry of the Court of Appeal’s judgment.

Photo of Hannah M. Arenstam Hannah M. Arenstam

Hannah Arenstam is an Associate in the Chicago office of Vedder Price and a member of the firm’s Litigation practice group.

While attending law school, Ms. Arenstam was President of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, a Teaching Assistant for Civil Procedure, and Executive

…

Hannah Arenstam is an Associate in the Chicago office of Vedder Price and a member of the firm’s Litigation practice group.

While attending law school, Ms. Arenstam was President of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, a Teaching Assistant for Civil Procedure, and Executive Articles Editor of the Journal of Law and Social Policy. She is currently an Advisory Board Member of the Center for Practice Engagement and Innovation at Northwestern University School of Law.

Prior to joining Vedder Price, Ms. Arenstam clerked for the MacArthur Justice Center at Northwestern University School of Law, served as a paralegal, and was a legal intern for the Volunteer Lawyers Project.

Read more about Hannah M. ArenstamEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Real Estate Advisor Law Blog
  • Organization:
    UB Greensfelder LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo