Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CHIEF JUDGE SLEET SETS LIMIT OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION TO TEN (10) TERMS PER PATENT IN PATENT ACTIONS

By Fox Rothschild LLP on October 21, 2009
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

By Order dated October 20, 2009, in Grape Technology Group, Inc., et al. v. Jingle Networks, Inc. (PDF), Chief Judge Sleet noted that the Court will impose a limit of ten (10) disputed terms per patent for claim construction in this action and all future patent actions.  Specifically, in the Order, Chief Judge Sleet stated as follows:

“The parties have submitted for construction 19 terms from U.S. Patent No. 7.023,969.  Although disinclined to do so in the past, the court – regrettably – will impose  a limit of 10 disputed terms per patent for claim construction in this and all future patent actions.”

Thus, parties in patent infringement actions in the District of Delaware should be strategic and careful to narrow the real claims in dispute that require claim construction. I’ve attached a copy of the Order (PDF) entered by Chief Judge Sleet.

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Delaware Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo