Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

U.S. Importers Leaving Money on the Table: Report Finds Substantial Underutilization of “First Sale Rule” to Reduce Import Duties

By Daniel Cannistra on June 16, 2010
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The issue:

Data presented by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) shows that many U.S. importers are not taking advantage of duty savings opportunities offered by the “first sale rule.” As a result, they are potentially paying substantially more in duties than they should.

Under the “first sale rule” U.S. importers may lower duties by using the first sales price for goods, which are sold multiple times before importation, to determine duty liability. For example, an item may be produced in China, sold to a middleman in Hong Kong, and in turn sold to a buyer/importer in Los Angeles. The first sale rule allows the U.S. importer to declare the product’s value, for import duty purposes, as the price of the original China-Hong Kong transaction. Because the value attributable to earlier sales may be lower than that assigned to later sales, use of the first sale rule can lower the duties paid by importers. It is not uncommon for the first sale rule to reduce import duty payments by 50 percent.

The ITC found that:

  • Of the $1.6 trillion in total U.S. imports, only 2% were imported using the “first sale rule,” suggesting that the overwhelming majority of imported goods are potentially paying much more in customs duties than they should.
  • Most importers in each industry do not even use the first sale rule. The textile, apparel, and footwear industry is one that stands to save the most by employing the “first sale rule” as its goods are subject some of the highest duty rates. However, only 5% of its goods are imported using the “first sale rule.” Another industry with high duty rates is food and agriculture; however, only 5% of its goods employ the “first sale rule.”

What you need to know about the law:

In 2008, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) attempted to eliminate the judicially mandated first sale rule, but CBP’s efforts met significant industry and Congressional opposition. As a result of this opposition, the Food Conservation and Energy Act of 2008 (the Act) prevented CBP from taking further action to revoke the first sale rule until at least January 1, 2011, and required importers to provide import data on the use of the first sale rule to enable the ITC to complete its report.

The ITC issued its report on December 29, 2009, examining U.S. imports between September 1, 2008, to August 31, 2009. The data presented suggests that many importers may not be taking advantage of the potential duty savings opportunities offered by the first sale rule.

Despite the small percentage of importers using the first sale rule, eliminating this rule would adversely impact importers who currently use the rule, and deprive other importers of the duty saving benefits that this rule offers. Certain importers may not use the first sale rule because it is difficult to meet the legal requirements to comply.

The First Sale strategy can be implemented for most companies that purchase merchandise from an overseas vendor that, in turn, obtains the merchandise from either a related or unrelated third party manufacturer. The focus of the technique is on helping importers realize substantial savings by enabling them to pay duty on the “ex works” cost of the merchandise when it leaves the factory, rather than the higher “second price” charged by the vendor that sells the merchandise to the importer.

Photo of Daniel Cannistra Daniel Cannistra

Dan Cannistra is a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. His practice focuses on legislative, executive and regulatory representation of domestic and international clients on a broad spectrum of international trade matters. Dan has represented domestic and foreign companies in over 75

…

Dan Cannistra is a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. His practice focuses on legislative, executive and regulatory representation of domestic and international clients on a broad spectrum of international trade matters. Dan has represented domestic and foreign companies in over 75 U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty cases before the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission under the Tariff Act of 1930. Many of these matters involved appeals to the U.S. Court of International Trade, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, binational panels under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and dispute settlement proceedings before the World Trade Organization (WTO). Dan has also represented clients in antidumping proceedings in the European Union, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, India, Thailand, Singapore, Guatemala and Taiwan.

Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Dan was a director in a national accounting firm providing customs and international trade guidance to multinational clients related to the supply and distribution of goods and services across international borders. Areas of specialization included antidumping and countervailing duties and policy, trade remedies and litigation, free trade agreements and negotiations, classification and valuation, and international trade and development.

Dan’s government appointments include service to U.S. Trade Representative on the roster of international trade practitioners to resolve antidumping disputes involving NAFTA members. For the European Commission, Dan provided advice and training on international trade and antidumping methodology and practice. In addition, Dan has served as an international trade consultant to the governments of Guatemala and Singapore, providing technical advice to these governments on the application of international trade regulations consistent with international law and World Trade Organization agreements and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Agreement on Antidumping.

Read more about Daniel CannistraEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo