Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Meal and Rest Period Uncertainty Remains (Pt. 2)

By Jeffrey D. Polsky on February 3, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Less than three months ago, I was lamenting the continuing uncertainty over whether California employers may simply make meal and rest breaks available or whether they must somehow ensure that they’re taken.  Even then, it had been over two years since the California Supreme Court granted review in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court.  Still, there was a glimmer of hope when an appellate court — Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill — issued a published decision holding that it was enough to provide the breaks (i.e. make them available).

Well, the uncertainty has increased.  The California Supreme Court has granted review in Hernandez, thereby rendering it no longer citable as precedent.  Is this surprising?  Not really.  But as I’ve said before, for an issue that affects so many employers, employees, and pending lawsuits, some definitive guidance would be helpful.  Look for it in the second half of 2011.

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    California Employment Law
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo