Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

USDA Inspector General Questions E. coli Testing

By Helena Bottemiller on March 3, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

U.S. Department of Agriculture Inspector General Phyllis Fong questioned the validity of the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) E. coli O157:H7 sampling program, raising questions about meat safety at a time when Congress is considering making cuts to the FSIS inspection budget.

In testimony before the House Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee Wednesday, General Fong told lawmakers her office completed an audit to assess FSIS’ sampling program for beef trim–currently inspectors take 60 samples from large lots of beef trim to test for E. coli O157:H7– and determined the current method “does not yield a statistical precision that is reasonable for food safety.” 

“Although 60 samples may be adequate to detect widespread contamination, more are needed when E. coli is less prevalent,” said Fong in her remarks. “FSIS current sampling methodology results in detection of E. coli less than half the time when it is present in 1 percent of a beef trim lot. Accordingly, we recommended that the agency place its testing process on sounder statistical ground by redesigning its sampling methodology to account for varying levels of contamination.”

Fong noted that FSIS “generally agreed” with her office’s findings and recommendations.

Washington, DC-based consumer group Food and Water Watch praised the IG report.

“We urge FSIS to work quickly to develop a comprehensive sampling and testing program for E. coli that will make food safer for consumers,” said Wenonah Hauter in a statement Wednesday, adding that FWW would like to see the agency:

“(1) Work to identify and remove all products produced during the same production shift as contaminated product through traceback and traceforward investigations of the entire production chain.

(2) Adopt measures to capture information about the suppliers for all positive test results, including industry-sampling programs. FSIS should conduct follow-up investigations and, when necessary, increase scrutiny at supplying slaughter plants.

(3) Identify research necessary to substantiate sampling theories it believes would improve its ability to protect public health.”

Fong said her office had also begun a review of FSIS E. coli testing protocols to ensure that beef trim is “effectively collected and analyzed.”

“Together, our beef trim sampling and testing audits should help bolster public confidence that FSIS tests are accurately identifying E. coli and ultimately preventing contaminated meat from being distributed and consumed,” said Fong.

General Fong’s prepared statement can be found here.

Photo of Helena Bottemiller Helena Bottemiller

Helena Bottemiller is a Washington, DC-based reporter covering food policy and politics for Food Safety News. She has covered Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, and several high-profile food safety stories, including the half-billion Salmonella egg recall and the oil spill in…

Helena Bottemiller is a Washington, DC-based reporter covering food policy and politics for Food Safety News. She has covered Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, and several high-profile food safety stories, including the half-billion Salmonella egg recall and the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Helena’s work has appeared in the Columbia Journalism Review, NBC News, and elsewhere. She has appeared on BBC, CNBC, and is widely cited by mainstream and niche media. She tweets about food and agriculture policy at @hbottemiller.

EmailHelena's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Food Safety News
  • Organization:
    Marler Clark, Inc., PS
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo