Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Court Enforces Property and Support Agreement Between Husband and Guardian for Incapacitated Wife

By Neil Cahn on March 14, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

unhealthy senior couple 2.jpgMarital financial planning is vital for spouses dealing with advanced age and deteriorating health.  Though not arising from an orchestrated plan, the February decision of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in Matter of Donald L.L. (Miceli), supports that planning.

After almost 40 years of marriage, the wife in 2005 suffered a stroke that left her with severe brain damage and unable to care for herself.  Her husband was also in poor health and was not capable of caring for his wife. In Guardianship proceedings, the court in 2008 determined that the wife was incapacitated and, by agreement of the husband, appointed someone other than the husband as the Guardian of the person and property of the wife.

At that time, as well, the husband entered a settlement with the Guardian resolving property and spousal support matters.  Their stipulation was “in the nature of an opting[-]out agreement as the same is provided for under the Domestic Relations Law. [They] do not intend to make this a divorce proceeding but would like [the stipulation] to serve as their agreement as to the issues . . . set forth [herein] and to that extent would also like to sign a written adoption of the oral stipulation.”

Five months later, the Guardian commenced this action seeking to enforce the financial settlement agreement. The Guardian also sought to void various allegedly fraudulent transfers by the husband. Justice David Michael Barry upheld the financial settlement agreement.

On appeal, the husband contended that Justice Barry erred when he granted the Guardian relief in the form of equitable distribution without conducting a hearing on the economic issues between him and his wife.

The Fourth Department affirmed. The agreement was enforceable.  No separate equitable distribution relief or hearing was required as there had been, expressly, no action to abrogate the marital status.

Upholding protective and necessary financial arrangements, while preserving lengthy marriages, is increasingly necessary.  Such arrangements, when knowingly entered with independent counsel, are to be promoted.

Photo of Neil Cahn Neil Cahn

A graduate of Yale College and a Law Review graduate of the Hofstra University School of Law, Neil Cahn has practiced law on Long Island for more than 40 years.

EmailNeil's Linkedin ProfileNeil's Twitter Profile
  • Posted in:
    Family
  • Blog:
    Divorce: New York
  • Organization:
    Neil Cahn, PLLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo