Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Construction Workplace Misclassification Act

By Carin A. O'Donnell on May 16, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Workers’ Compensation Act requires a contractor/employer to stand in reserve and provide workers’ compensation insurance for subcontractors and their employees, if that subcontractor does not have insurance. Originally the Workers’ Compensation Act set enacted this requirement in order to protect workers. The legislature believed that making the contractor responsible for workers’ compensation benefits when its subcontractor was uninsured, would force the hiring contractor to make sure that the subcontractor it hired had insurance. However, that is not what happened. 

Contractors shortly learned that the law does not require the contractor to provide workers’ compensation insurance to a subcontractor or its workers if they were an “independent contractor’. So, in order to avoid paying higher workers’ compensation insurance, contractors are calling all subcontractors “independent contractors” even when the subcontractor is not truly an independent contractor. The reality of this is that the injured worker suffers the consequences by being denied a workers’ compensation benefits because of the, sometimes intentional, mis-classification of the subcontractor.

In an effort to avoid the above scenario, on February 10, 2011 the Construction Workplace Misclassification Act took effect. The purpose of this Act is to prevent employers from classifying their subcontractors as “independent contractors” in order to avoid paying workers compensation benefits. According to this Act, for the purposes of Workers compensation you are considered an “independent contractor” only if the following is met:

  1. The individual has a written contract to perform such services.
  2. The individual is free from control or direction over performance of such services goes under the contract of service and in fact.
  3. As to such services the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business.

Under this Act, it doesn’t matter if federal/state income taxes are being withheld or if unemployment compensation or workers’ compensation premiums are being paid. If a subcontractor meets the above criteria, they are considered an independent contractor.

The Act also goes to provide  a deterrent for those who improperly classify a subcontractor as “independent”.  If an officer or agent of the employer violates this Act, the employer can face criminal penalties including a misdemeanor of the third degree for a first offense, a misdemeanor of the second degree for a second or offense and/or be ordered to pay a fine of up to $1,000. 

If you feel that you have been denied workers compensation benefits because a company you worked for classified you as an independent contractor, you can file a complaint online using the  “Construction Workplace Misclassification Complaint Form”. This form can be found on the Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry website form number LLC-72. Should you have any questions, or feel you have been denied benefits by being classified an “independent contractor” rather than an employee, please call us at 267-907-9600.

Photo of Carin A. O'Donnell Carin A. O'Donnell

Carin A. O’Donnell is a Shareholder and member of Stark & Stark’s Accident & Personal Injury and Construction Injury Groups where she concentrates her practice in wrongful death and catastrophic injury litigation. Ms. O’Donnell is a trial attorney who has successfully litigated personal…

Carin A. O’Donnell is a Shareholder and member of Stark & Stark’s Accident & Personal Injury and Construction Injury Groups where she concentrates her practice in wrongful death and catastrophic injury litigation. Ms. O’Donnell is a trial attorney who has successfully litigated personal injury matters resulting in multiple verdicts exceeding a million dollars. Her extensive trial experience has helped her win cases for plaintiffs in counties that typically favor defense verdicts. As a result, her cases have been featured in local papers, radio shows and legal publications.

Read more about Carin A. O'DonnellEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Pennsylvania Law Monitor
  • Organization:
    Stark & Stark
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo