Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CU Says Turkey Test for Salmonella Is Too Lax

By Dan Flynn on August 8, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Maybe if USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) did not allow so much Salmonella to get into ground turkey in the first place, the current outbreak could have been avoided.

That’s how Consumers Union, the Yonkers, NY publisher of Consumer Reports, sees it. The consumer nonprofit Friday called upon USDA to “drastically tighten its present Salmonella standard.”

Currently, CU says, the FSIS standard for Salmonella allows almost half of the samples tested at ground turkey processors to be contaminated with the pathogen.

“The current USDA ground turkey standard, which allows 49.9 percent of samples in a test run to be positive for Salmonella, is unacceptable and clearly ineffective as a tool for food safety,” said Jean Halloran, director of Food Policy Initiatives at Consumers Union.  

The ground turkey industry generally meets the current USDA standard. USDA tests of 121 samples of ground turkey at 22 ground turkey facilities in the first quarter of 2011 show that 10.7 percent were contaminated, about the same number as for 2010.  Consumers Union believes this level is too high and a tighter standard is needed.  

“For one in ten packages of ground turkey to potentially be contaminated with disease-causing Salmonella is simply too great a risk,” said Halloran. “The current USDA standard, which allows almost 50 percent to be contaminated, is completely ineffectual as a tool for reducing this level.”

USDA recently reduced its acceptable level of Salmonella in whole turkeys from 19 percent to 1.7 percent contaminated in a given series of tests. “USDA should make a similar drastic reduction in its performance standard for ground turkey,”  said Halloran.

CU says that similar problems exist with ground chicken, where Salmonella levels are even higher — about one third contaminated in USDA’s 2011 first quarter tests — and the USDA standard for acceptable contamination is 44.6 percent of samples.  

CU periodically has tested whole chicken and found high levels of bacterial contamination since 1998.

An outbreak of antibiotic resistant Salmonella Heidelberg was announced by FSIS and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on July 29.  The outbreak so far has killed one person in California and sickened at least 77 others, with about 40 percent of those requiring hospitalization.

FSIS on Aug. 3 announced Cargill was recalling 36 million pounds of ground turkey manufactured at its Arkansas plant since February.

 

Photo of Dan Flynn Dan Flynn

Dan Flynn is a Denver-based writer and editor with more than ten years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a journalist included working…

Dan Flynn is a Denver-based writer and editor with more than ten years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a journalist included working for newspapers throughout the West, from the Black Hills to Seattle. His on-scene reporting on the collapse of the Idaho’s Teton Dam and the suicide bombing at Washington State University’s Perham Hall was carried by newspapers around the world and was recognized both times regionally by the Associated Press for Best Reporting on a Deadline. Most of the disasters he attends these days involve food illnesses.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Food Safety News
  • Organization:
    Marler Clark, Inc., PS
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo