Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

EU State aid rules: Tax measures can and must be assessed under the market investor principle

By Antitrust, Competition, and Economic Regulation Practice on June 29, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

standing numbersOn June 5, 2012, the EU Court of Justice ruled that tax measures may avoid the qualification of State aid if the State acts as a private investor, i.e. if the State’s decision is based on economic evaluations comparable to those which, in the circumstances, a rational private investor in a situation as close as possible to that of the Member State would have had carried out. 

This complex case can be summarized in one –apparently– simple question: can the Commission refuse to apply the “Market Economy Investor Principle” to a State measure involving tax prerogatives, because such measures are by nature not available to private investors? The Court answers in the negative and casts a new light on the application of the Market Economy Investor Principle to tax measures. 

Michel Debroux in our Paris office represents EDF in this complex and lengthy case worth over EUR 1.3 billion and secured a high-profile victory in front the of the Court’s Grand Chamber and against the Advocate General’s opinion, which is rare.

The Court ruling is available at http://curia.europa.eu (case C-124/10 P).

  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo