Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Delaware Test For “Direct” vs. “Derivative” Claims Adopted by NY Appellate Court

By Greg Jacobs on August 10, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This post was written by Herbert F. Kozlov and Lawrence J. Reina.

In a case of first impression in New York, the Appellate Division, First Department, has adopted the test the Supreme Court of Delaware developed in Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031, 1039 (Del 2004) for determining the difference between a “derivative” claim and a “direct” claim in shareholder derivative lawsuits.

Please click here to read the issued Client Alert.

  • Posted in:
    Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Blog:
    Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Reed Smith LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo