Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles: Supreme Court To Decide Whether Plaintiffs May Evade Federal Jurisdiction Under CAFA By Stipulating That They Seek Less Than $5 Million In Damages

By Kevin Ranlett on September 26, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The first question my colleagues and I ask when a client has been sued in a class action in state court is whether the case can be removed to federal court. Often, the only ticket out of state court is the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), which authorizes removal of certain mass and class actions in which the “matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs.” 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). Accordingly, plaintiffs who want to stay in state court are constantly looking for ways to prevent removal under CAFA. The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles, No. 11-1450, to decide the fate of one such tactic—attaching to the complaint a stipulation attesting that the plaintiffs seek less than $5 million in damages.

We’ll be talking more about Knowles on this blog in the coming weeks. In the meantime, we’re posting the lower court’s decision, the petition for certiorari, the cert-stage amicus briefs filed by the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the Center for Class Action Fairness, the brief in opposition, and the reply brief.

Photo of Kevin Ranlett Kevin Ranlett

Kevin Ranlett is a partner in the firm’s Supreme Court & Appellate and Consumer Litigation & Class Actions practices. He has defended businesses in numerous complex class and representative actions in state and federal courts across the country and in proceedings before the…

Kevin Ranlett is a partner in the firm’s Supreme Court & Appellate and Consumer Litigation & Class Actions practices. He has defended businesses in numerous complex class and representative actions in state and federal courts across the country and in proceedings before the American Arbitration Association. In addition to drafting critical trial motions, Kevin has a substantial appellate practice. He has written merits or amicus briefs in appeals involving issues of class certification, arbitration, securities law, federal preemption, the Alien Tort Statute, punitive damages, and employment discrimination. He also advises businesses in drafting and enforcing consumer and employee arbitration agreements.

Read Kevin’s full bio.

Read more about Kevin RanlettEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Class Action & Mass Torts
  • Blog:
    Class Defense Blog
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo