Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Prevailing Defendants entitled to Attorney’s fees in ADA cases, Jankey v. Lee

By Dale Campbell on December 26, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Check out the recent success of Weintraub Tobin’s Labor & Employment group in the California Supreme Court’s decision issued in Jankey v. Lee on December 17, 2012.  Lizbeth West, Esq., led the charge with the help of several other Weintraub Tobin attorneys, and filed an amicus brief with the California Supreme Court on behalf of 11 business and trade organizations.  The California Supreme Court relied on authority and arguments contained in Weintraub Tobin’s amicus curiae brief and ruled that the attorney’s fee provision in California Civil Code section 55 applies equally to prevailing defendants (as well as prevailing plaintiffs) and that an award of fees is mandatory to the prevailing party.  The Court also determined that California Civil Code section 55 is not preempted by the ADA!  For more information and a detailed summary of the Court’s decision, please see the attached blog posted by Lizeth West, Esq.  http://www.thelelawblog.com/2012/12/articles/labor-law/the-california-supreme-court-issued-a-win-for-businesses-who-prevail-in-disability-access-cases-in-california/

 

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    The Real Estate & Environmental Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Weintraub Tobin
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo