Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

NYSE Sends Letter to Foreign Private Issuers

By Joey Shabot ^ on February 26, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last week, the New York Stock Exchange’s regulation group sent its traditional annual letter to foreign private issuers (FPIs) that are listed on the Big Board. The letter reminds FPIs of the corporate governance and notification and filing obligations that the NYSE imposes on its listed companies. These requirements are separate from, and in some cases incremental to, the requirements imposed by the SEC or a listed company’s home country regulator. The letter focused on the following NYSE requirements:

  • Exchange notification of material events, including dividend record dates, shareholders meeting and other corporate action events;
  • Annual financial statement publication;
  • Corporate governance requirements on board and audit committee membership;
  • Transactions that require supplemental listing applications;
  • Transactions requiring shareholder approval and the voting rights rule;
  • The NYSE’s “timely alert policy” requiring companies to publicly release any news or information which might reasonably be expected to materially affect the market for its securities.

In some cases, the NYSE has discretion to waive certain requirements, and in other cases it does not. For example, the exchange cannot waive or shorten the notification requirements for record dates. On the other hand, the exchange has the ability to waive, in some cases, the shareholder approval requirements for certain securities issuances. When planning corporate action events, it is important not to overlook the exchange rule overlay to the securities laws, and for a listed company to consult with counsel who is knowledgeable in this area.

The NYSE staff is generally willing to provide confidential letter rulings on questions or doubts that can arise regarding the interpretation of its listing standards. For example, if asked, the exchange will tell a listed company in advance whether it will permit brokers to vote uninstructed customer shares with respect to a particular proposal. For this reason, in cases of extraordinary transactions or proposals, it is sometimes advisable to confidentially send preliminary proxy statements to the exchange staff for review even prior to filing the material with the SEC.

Photo of Joey Shabot ^ Joey Shabot ^

Joey T. Shabot is the Managing Shareholder of the Tel-Aviv office and focuses his practice on mergers and acquisitions, including corporate law, securities law and financing. His experience includes advising on mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, partnerships, securities offerings and private placements, in transactions…

Joey T. Shabot is the Managing Shareholder of the Tel-Aviv office and focuses his practice on mergers and acquisitions, including corporate law, securities law and financing. His experience includes advising on mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, partnerships, securities offerings and private placements, in transactions involving companies across a variety of industries throughout the world including the U.S., Israel, China, Japan, Europe, and Latin America.

Joey also dedicates himself to pro bono work in which he represents United Hatzalah, an international first response organization, the global WIZO organization, and other global charities.

^ Attorneys in the Tel Aviv office do not practice Israeli law.

Read more about Joey Shabot ^EmailJoey's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Blog:
    GT Israel Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo