Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Should the government favor union contractors for large-scale construction projects?

By Terry Potter on March 5, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Project Labor Agreements have become increasingly common on federal government construction projects, especially since the issuance of Executive Order 13502 [pdf] and the implementing regulations (FAR Subpart 22.5). These rules encourage the use of PLAs in connection with all “large-scale construction projects,” defined as a “project where the total cost to the Federal Government is $25 million or more.” Opposition to these rules focused on the potential for discriminatory impact on non-union contractors and employees. Implementation has not been without controversy either, with contentious litigation focusing on the discriminatory impact of PLAs on government projects.

Given the background, it is not surprising that we are seeing new legislation to provide federal agencies with more flexibility in the use of PLAs. See Government Neutrality in Contracting Act (H.R. 436 and S. 109) (introduced January 29, 2013). Proponents of the legislation cite to studies indicating that government-mandated PLAs increase the cost of construction projects between 12 percent and 18 percent.

Similar bills were introduced last year and did not make it out of committee.  We will see what happens in the current Congress.

Photo of Terry Potter Terry Potter

A former field attorney with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Terry views labor and employment cases from an insider’s perspective. He represents employers in collective bargaining, arbitrations and union avoidance techniques in a myriad of factual settings before the NLRB, National Mediation…

A former field attorney with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Terry views labor and employment cases from an insider’s perspective. He represents employers in collective bargaining, arbitrations and union avoidance techniques in a myriad of factual settings before the NLRB, National Mediation Board (NMB) and various state public labor relations boards.

Read more about Terry PotterEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    The Contractor's Perspective
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo