Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Shale gas exploration: European Commission launches stakeholder Consultation

By Douglas Wheeler, Joanne Rotondi, Jennifer Biever, C. Kyle Simpson, Christopher Norton & Jacqueline Mailly on March 19, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The European Commission is completing a Consultation on the need for additional regulation of unconventional fossil fuel (e.g., shale gas) exploration and development in Europe. The Consultation period ends on 23 March 2013 and results will be made available on the Commission’s website and at a stakeholders’ meeting to be held by the Commission in April 2013.

The Consultation is the first step in what will most likely be a lengthy regulatory exercise. Existing and proposed regulatory regimes in the United States could provide some useful lessons for Europe. Presently in the U.S., tension exists between the exercise of regulatory authority by the states and local governments specifically impacted by oil and gas development and the emergence of federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing, including regulation of such activities on public lands. Following close of the Consultation period, Hogan Lovells will convene an international webinar, both to discuss the issues raised during the Consultation and to compare the U.S. regulatory environment with trends in Europe.

Background on the European Commission’s regulatory review

Based on a 2011 preliminary assessment, the Commission concluded that existing EU Regulation does apply to practices required for unconventional gas exploration and production, but that more information was deemed necessary to ensure the adequacy of the existing EU regulatory framework. In 2012, the Commission released three studies on shale gas, including one that raised several questions regarding potential environmental risks and the adequacy of existing EU Regulation, which the Commission then determined warranted further consideration. (See Support to the Identification of Potential Risks for the Environment and Human Health Arising From Hydrocarbons Operations Involving Hydraulic Fracturing in Europe).

The Commission’s initiative arises amidst a rapidly evolving situation in Europe, with potentially, significant implications for the continued development of unconventional hydrocarbons. Facing increasing reliance on imported gas supplies, several EU Member States are interested in exploring and developing shale gas resources, which preliminary studies suggest may be extensive throughout Europe, including in Poland, UK, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Romania, Lithuania, Denmark, Sweden, Hungary, Bulgaria, and France. However, given public concerns around unknown environmental impacts some Member States (including France, Bulgaria, and the Netherlands) have imposed temporary or indefinite moratoria on the use of hydraulic fracturing practices necessary to extract unconventional hydrocarbons, while others such as Denmark have initiated, or are poised to initiate, reviews of the adequacy of their domestic legislation and the need for additional regulation or guidance. Consequently, high volume hydraulic fracturing has not yet been used to any great extent in Europe, and the practice has been limited primarily to lower volume fracturing of tight gas and conventional reservoirs offshore and onshore in Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, and the UK.

The Commission believes that these developments support the need for a clear, predictable, and coherent approach to the development of unconventional hydrocarbons across the EU.

Experience gained in the United States

In many ways, the European situation parallels the development of unconventional hydrocarbon resources in the U.S. In less than a decade, technological advancements and the integration of horizontal wells with hydraulic fracturing practices have enabled the rapid development of domestic shale gas resources, to the extent that the U.S. has evolved from an overall importer of natural gas to an exporter of this now-abundant commodity. As of 2012, current or prospective shale gas development projects were extant in at least 31 states.

Although regulation of oil and gas production has traditionally been the province of the states and local government, the proliferation of new projects and use of advanced technology have given rise to a clamor for uniform federal regulation of shale gas production. This is especially true of development on public lands, which are managed by the federal government. The regulation of unconventional hydrocarbon development (of both private and public mineral interests) covers dozens of elements, including those relating to air and water quality, disposal of flowback/process water, identification and disclosure of process chemicals, surface access, location, site development and preparation, ecological and socio-economic considerations, well plugging and abandonment, and well inspection and enforcement, among many others. The U.S. experience with these complexities will undoubtedly prove relevant to the evolving situation in Europe.

Following publication of the Commission’s Consultation findings Hogan Lovells will host a stakeholder webinar on unconventional hydrocarbon development in the U.S. and EU.

Photo of Jacqueline Mailly Jacqueline Mailly

Senior EU Regulatory Affairs Advisor, Brussels

Widely recognized as a trusted adviser in EU food and biotechnology regulation, Jacqueline is solution-driven, pragmatic and down-to-earth. Clients appreciate her ability to tune in to their specific needs and to quickly grasp technical issues.  She dove-tails…

Senior EU Regulatory Affairs Advisor, Brussels

Widely recognized as a trusted adviser in EU food and biotechnology regulation, Jacqueline is solution-driven, pragmatic and down-to-earth. Clients appreciate her ability to tune in to their specific needs and to quickly grasp technical issues.  She dove-tails with in-house resources to create the most efficient and effective advisory team.

Having practiced in Brussels for more than 20 years, Jacqueline is familiar with the EU administrative procedures and the roles and responsibilities of administrators, scientists, private parties, and politicians in ensuring consumer, plant, and animal health and safety. She provides a comprehensive service, including compliance-based and strategic advice across the spectrum of food regulation, including advertising, health and nutrition claims, GMOs, contaminants, and food and feed safety.  She assists companies on product recalls and crisis management and has been successful in fending off a number of potential bans on product sales in EU Member States.  Clients say that she ‘works tirelessly’, ‘quickly gets to grip with the issues’, and ‘provides practical, easy-to-understand advice’ (The Legal 500).

Jacqueline also advises on certain specific areas of EU environmental policy and regulation and was awarded the Euromoney Europe Award 2013, Best in Environment for Women in Business.

Read more about Jacqueline MaillyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo