Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

U.S. Postal Service hunting for patent infringers

By David P. Hendel on March 28, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

“Oh, a-hunting we will go!” The U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General (OIG) is looking for a supplier to help it track down infringers of the agency’s patents and other intellectual property. Under a solicitation issued on March 26, 2013, the OIG intends to start with five patents that have the “highest potential for infringement or licensing.” OIG has already examined six USPS patents for this purpose, including those involving:

  • managing powered industrial vehicles,
  • web-based address corrections,
  • image lift and capture, and
  • tracking a moveable article.

The Postal Service has identified 181 agency-owned patents that show promise for commercial development or catching infringers. These will be narrowed down by the OIG and the supplier to five. The supplier will then research online data from the US Patent and Trademark Office, assess potential commercial value of the patent, and evaluate the opportunity for potential licensing revenue and recovery of royalties. In other words, become the Postal Service’s patent troll.

Unlike other federal agencies, the Postal Service is not subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and has a slightly different approach to intellectual property than its federal cousins. For example, the Postal Service occasionally seeks outright ownership of patent rights, not just unlimited rights in them. Companies who contract with the Postal Service should take care to ensure that they do not inadvertently hand over intellectual property rights to the agency. The good news is that the Postal Service’s standard intellectual property contract clauses are not necessarily set in stone. Under the USPS Supplying Principles and Practices manual, which sets out the agency’s unique procurement policies and rules, these clauses are subject to negotiation or alternatives proposed by the supplier.

Photo of David P. Hendel David P. Hendel

David regularly advises clients on a wide variety of issues arising under federal contracts, including selection and award, protests and disagreements, contract administration, contract interpretation, subcontracting, compliance, changes, equitable adjustments, claims and disputes, false claims and fraud investigations, audits, Freedom of Information Act…

David regularly advises clients on a wide variety of issues arising under federal contracts, including selection and award, protests and disagreements, contract administration, contract interpretation, subcontracting, compliance, changes, equitable adjustments, claims and disputes, false claims and fraud investigations, audits, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, termination, and debarment. He frequently advises on U.S. Postal Service contracting matters, which are subject to unique laws, regulations, and clauses.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    The Contractor's Perspective
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo