Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

D.C. Circuit Upholds Broad EPA Veto Power Over Wetlands Permits

By Marc Bruner on April 30, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Section 404 of the Clean Water Act grants the EPA “veto” power over fill permits issued by the Army Corps of Engineers.  On April 23, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the EPA’s authority to annul a Corps permit even after it has been issued to the project applicant.  The court relied on the language of Section 404, which states that the EPA may “withdraw” a Corps permit “whenever” it determines there is an unacceptable adverse effect on certain aquatic resources.  According to the court, this language evidences Congress’ intention to allow the EPA to exercise its veto powers “at any time” (court’s emphasis).  Mingo Logan Coal Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, __F.3d__ (D.C. Cir. Case No. 12-5150, Apr. 23, 2013). 

This issue has been gaining in importance, as the EPA has increasingly used its veto power in recent years.  This was the first time, though likely not the last, that the EPA vetoed a permit that the Corps already had issued.  See our recent update for more information about the D.C. Circuit’s decision.

  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    California Land Use & Development Law Report
  • Organization:
    Perkins Coie LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo