Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

New Jersey Pay Equity Measure Says No Reprisals Against Employees Requesting Information About Co-Workers

By Lawrence R. Sandak & Daniel Saperstein on September 5, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On August 28, 2013, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie signed A-2648 to add a new non-retaliation pay equity measure to the Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”) (hereinafter, the “amendment” or “law”). The amendment prohibits an employer from retaliating against any employee who requests information concerning the job title, occupational category, rate of compensation (including benefits), gender, race, ethnicity, military status, or national origin of any other employee or former employee, provided that the purpose of the request is to investigate potential discriminatory treatment, or take legal action for discriminatory treatment, concerning pay, compensation, bonuses, or other compensation (hereinafter, “protected information”). The amendment makes it clear that an employer is not required to release protected information in response to an employee’s request, but only prohibits reprisals against any employee who makes such a request.

The law as signed by the Governor is a narrower version of a prior bill that originally proposed to amend New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act (“CEPA”) to prohibit retaliation against employees both for requesting protected information and disclosing such information. Although the law now amends the LAD rather than CEPA and does not specifically protect an employee who discloses protected information, the amendment nevertheless may open the door for CEPA claims by employees who suffer retaliation for objecting to or disclosing violations of the new law.

Employers in New Jersey should consider reexamining and recirculating written policies concerning the handling of requests for and disclosures of employee information, and should ensure that managerial and supervisory staff are aware of the new non-retaliation provisions. Given the sensitivity of imposing limitations on employee discussions of compensation, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment, employers should exercise caution before making such decisions. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the amendment, please contact your Proskauer lawyer.

Photo of Lawrence R. Sandak Lawrence R. Sandak

Lawrence R. Sandak, a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department, is head of the firm’s Newark office and co-head of the firm’s Law Firm Practice Group. With more than 30 years of employment law experience, Larry gives practical, cost-effective advice to…

Lawrence R. Sandak, a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department, is head of the firm’s Newark office and co-head of the firm’s Law Firm Practice Group. With more than 30 years of employment law experience, Larry gives practical, cost-effective advice to clients on a broad range of issues.

As a trial lawyer and litigator, Larry defends employers accused of discrimination, retaliation, sexual harassment, breach of contract, and wage and hour violations. According to Chambers USA, Larry’s “trial history attracts acclaim” and he is perceived as an “excellent relationship builder” who understands employment litigation “absolutely inside out.” As one interviewee noted, he is “hugely determined to accommodate all of our needs.” And US Legal 500, which ranks Proskauer’s employment litigation team in the first tier nationally, recognizes Larry’s contribution to the team’s “premier” reputation and reports that he “is praised by clients for his ‘hands-on litigation experience, and great ability to deal with the opposition,'” as well as for being “extremely knowledgeable, smart and savvy.”

Read more about Lawrence R. SandakEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Daniel Saperstein Daniel Saperstein
Email
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Proskauer Whistleblower Defense
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • The FTI Award Journal
  • International Dispute Resolution
  • China Law Update Blog
  • Law of The Ledger
  • Antitrust Law Blog
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo