Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

HHS Makes Good on Its Promise: Releases HIPAA Guidance for Refill Reminder Programs

By Martin R. Dix on September 23, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As previously reported, HHS announced earlier this month that it would be providing clarification on the HIPAA Privacy Rule as it relates to marketing and prescription refill reminder programs.  On September 19, 2013, HHS made good on that promise when the Office for Civil Rights announced guidance on when refill reminders and other communications about drugs currently being prescribed for an individual do not constitute “marketing” and thus do not require prior patient authorization.

The announcement provides a test for when refill reminders will not be considered marketing (“refill reminder exception”).  The test focuses on two questions:   First, is the communication about a currently prescribed drug or biologic?  Second, if there is remuneration for the communication, is it reasonable?

The announcement also contains the following guidance for applying the test and a number of FAQs dealing with specific situations:

1. Is the Communication about a Currently Prescribed Drug or Biologic?

WITHIN EXCEPTION:

Communications that are:

  • Refill reminders;
  • About a recently lapsed prescription (one that has lapsed within the last 90 calendar days);
  • About generic equivalents of a drug being prescribed;
  • Adherence communications encouraging individuals to take prescribed medicines as directed; or
  • About all aspects of the drug delivery system for a prescribed a self-administered drug.

NOT WITHIN EXCEPTION:

Communications:

  • About specific new formulations of a currently prescribed medicine;
  • About specific adjunctive drugs related to the currently prescribed medicine; or
  • Encouraging an individual to switch from a prescribed medicine to an alternative medicine.

2.  Does the Communication Involve Financial Remuneration, and If So, Is It Reasonable?

WITHIN EXCEPTION:

Communications:

  • That do not involve remuneration;
  • Involving only non-financial or in-kind remuneration, such as supplies, computers, or other materials;
  • Involving only payment from a party other than the third party (or other than on behalf of the third party) whose product or service is being described in the communication, such as payment from a health plan.

Remuneration:

  • Involving payments to the covered entity by a pharmaceutical manufacturer or other third party whose product is being described that cover the reasonable direct and indirect costs related to the refill reminder or medication adherence program, or other excepted communications, including labor, materials, and supplies, as well as capital and overhead costs; or
  • Involving payments to a business associate assisting a covered entity in carrying out a refill reminder or medication adherence program, or to make other excepted communications, up to the fair market value of the business associate’s services.  The payments may be made by a third party whose product is being described directly to the business associate or through the covered entity to the business associate.

NOT WITHIN EXCEPTION

  • Communication involves financial remuneration other than as described above.

As reported in the earlier post, HHS will not enforce the restrictions on remunerated refill reminders and other communications until November 7, 2013.

Photo of Martin R. Dix Martin R. Dix

Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law, Martin Dix focuses his practice primarily on pharmacy and drug distribution law. His clients encompass nearly all aspects of the legal drug delivery system, including pharmacies, pharmacists, and pharmacy benefit managers; drug wholesalers; drug…

Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law, Martin Dix focuses his practice primarily on pharmacy and drug distribution law. His clients encompass nearly all aspects of the legal drug delivery system, including pharmacies, pharmacists, and pharmacy benefit managers; drug wholesalers; drug and dietary supplement manufacturers; retail medical oxygen dealers; and compressed medical gases wholesalers. He has also represented a variety of other health care providers and entities, such as physician practices, health care clinics, clinical laboratories, mental health centers, home health agencies and hospitals.

Read more about Martin R. DixEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Health Law Rx
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo