Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Patent Owners Beware: Federal Court Arguments for Broad Claim Construction May Be Used Against You in Post Grant Proceedings

By Shaton C. Menzie on October 25, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Patent applicants know to think carefully about the statements they make to the USPTO while working toward patent issuance. The reason? Statements made to the USPTO during patent prosecution have historically been fair game as evidence of claim limitations in issued patents. Now, thanks to the AIA, patent owners must be equally as careful when making statements about the claims of their issued patents when in Federal court. The reason? In a post grant proceeding, a party challenging the patent can use the patent owner’s statement against them as evidence that a claim is unpatentable.

Read more

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    AIA Blog
  • Organization:
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo