Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

HHS Guidance Clouds Earlier Statement, Discourages Providers From Purchasing Insurance for Patients

By Sheryl D. Rosen & Bruce D. Platt on November 13, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

There has been much speculation in the health care community that it may be financially beneficial, under certain circumstances, for hospitals and other large providers to purchase health care coverage for their indigent patients.  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius recently stated that Qualified Health Plans, which are sold on the federal health care Marketplace, are not considered federal health care programs under Section 1128B of the Social Security Act. Some believe this signaled that such plans would not be subject to the federal anti-kickback statute – and, therefore, that paying a patient’s premium would not violate the federal anti-kickback law. However, on November 4, 2013, the Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight issued the following guidance, which calls into question that interpretation:

Q: Are third party payors permitted to make premium payments to health insurance issuers for qualified health plans on behalf of enrolled individuals?

A: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has broad authority to regulate the Federal and State Marketplaces (e.g., section 1321(a) of the Affordable Care Act). It has been suggested that hospitals, other healthcare providers, and other commercial entities may be considering supporting premium payments and cost-sharing obligations with respect to qualified health plans purchased by patients in the Marketplaces. HHS has significant concerns with this practice because it could skew the insurance risk pool and create an unlevel field in the Marketplaces. HHS discourages this practice and encourages issuers to reject such third party payments. HHS intends to monitor this practice and to take appropriate action, if necessary.

This November 4 guidance highlights that HHS is closely looking at this potential practice as a source of instability in the insurance market, which relies on having a substantial proportion of healthy members to help pay for the more costly, sick members. Hospitals and other providers should be leery about making patient insurance premium payments unless and until there is further guidance from HHS stating that it is acceptable.

Photo of Bruce D. Platt Bruce D. Platt

Bruce Platt serves as managing partner of Akerman’s Tallahassee office. With a background in healthcare and medical technology, he helps insurers, providers, and related companies navigate federal and state regulations and administrative law. Clients rely on Bruce for guidance on complex regulations, such…

Bruce Platt serves as managing partner of Akerman’s Tallahassee office. With a background in healthcare and medical technology, he helps insurers, providers, and related companies navigate federal and state regulations and administrative law. Clients rely on Bruce for guidance on complex regulations, such as the Florida Insurance Code, HIPAA, and the Affordable Care Act. His clients include Aetna, AvMed, Florida Blue, Health First, and UnitedHealthcare, among others.

Read more about Bruce D. PlattEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy, Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Health Law Rx
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo