Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Retirement plan beneficiary designations shouldn’t be one and done

By Jerry Kalish on March 9, 2014
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

What did Amy Winehouse, Jimi Hendrix, Heath Ledger, and Whitney Houston have in common?

No. not just being in the celebrity spotlight, but rather, estate planning done wrong or not at all.

You can add one more celebrity to the list who Darla Mercado writes about in her InvestmentNews article, He needed a script: Actor Philip Seymour Hoffman left a legal mess behind.

Mr. Hoffman, who died February 2, 2014, did have a will that was signed on October 7, 2004. But in the almost 10 years that followed, it became out-of-date because of changing circumstances.

For retirement plan participants changing, or for that matter, changed circumstances, can also affect those beneficiary designations.

There is, of course, ERISA’s spousal consent rule for beneficiary designation which simply stated provides

  • In defined benefit plans and some defined contribution plans, the death benefit for a married participant must be in the form of a spousal annuity unless spousal consent is obtained in another form, a lump sum if it’s available.
  • The spousal consent rule also applies to most defined contributions plans, such as 401(k) and profit sharing. The surviving spouse must be the sole and direct beneficiary of the participant unless he or she provides spousal consent subject to special rules.

But sometimes changing circumstances intervene to invoke the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Those changed circumstances could be a divorce, remarriage, birth or death of a loved one,  or even a pre-nuptial agreement. Changes in the law can also impact beneficiary designations such as the recent Supreme Court’s Windsor decision.

This decision and subsequent Internal Revenue Service and Department of Labor guidance had the immediate effect of granting same-sex couples who are married under state law the same federal rights, protections, and responsibilities that are afforded to married opposite-sex couples under the Internal Revenue Code and ERISA.

In plain English, it means the Windsor decision affect those situations in which a “spouse” could be involved such as lump sum death benefits, annuity benefits, and spousal consents.

One final note: retirement plan beneficiary designations are not governed by a will.  Retirement plan participants should consult with an experienced attorney about completing beneficiary designation forms as part of an overall estate plan, and then reviewing them on a regular basis. 

Jerry Kalish

Jerry Kalish is President of National Benefit Services, Inc., retirement plan consultants and administrators, which he founded in 1978 when 401(k) was enacted into law.

He is a member of the Great Lakes Area TE/GE Council, a 501(c)(3) organization whose members are benefit…

Jerry Kalish is President of National Benefit Services, Inc., retirement plan consultants and administrators, which he founded in 1978 when 401(k) was enacted into law.

He is a member of the Great Lakes Area TE/GE Council, a 501(c)(3) organization whose members are benefit practitioners who meet regularly with the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor on ERISA matters.

Jerry provides continuing education programs for attorneys, CPAs, and the financial services industry and has co-taught the course on non-ERISA retirement plans, 403(b) plans, and 457 plans at John Marshall School of Law LLM Program in Employee Benefits.

He is on the International Advisory Board of The Center on Business and Poverty, a non-profit organization that supports businesses and non-profits that embody the practice of participatory capitalism.

Read more about Jerry KalishEmailJerry's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    The Retirement Plan Blog
  • Organization:
    National Benefit Services, Inc.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo