Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Is the Internal Revenue Service Lying?

By Admin on June 16, 2014
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Do you remember the controversy where the IRS was accused of targeting and unfairly auditing the Tea Party?

In an article Sunday from CNN’s Political Ticker by Sara Fischer, the IRS has claimed that it is unable to recover subpoenaed emails from former IRS official Lois Lerner. The reason given is a “computer crash.”

A firestorm has erupted in the media and many are calling it a “cover up,” alleging the crash is “convenient” for President Obama’s administration.

Anyone who works on a daily basis with the IRS, like I do, knows that the IRS is very particular about email and computers in general.  With emails, specifically, the IRS has very stringent policies.  Most of the policies, I believe, center around privacy rules – which is important.

But it is very hard for me to believe that Lois Lerner’s emails were lost because her computer crashed.

In this day and age, large organizations do not keep emails saved on individual computers.  Instead, they are saved on large servers that are regularly backed up to provide needed security and prevent that information from getting lost.

If the IRS is working without basic safeguards, that is a problem in and of itself.  It is just not good business practice.  For an organization as large and as important as the IRS, it must function properly.  Anything else is deplorable.

If the “failure” to provide the emails is more sinister – meaning either Ms. Lerner or the IRS have concocted a story of a computer crash on purpose – then an investigation is necessary.  If true, then Ms. Lerner or the IRS should be concerned about a criminal investigation (See 2 U.S.C 192 and 194).

A taxpayer in a civil or criminal examination before the IRS would not be cut much slack.  Undoubtedly they would be subject to a myriad of penalties.

Bottom line is any organization that can punish its citizens either through the civil examination process or through criminal investigations needs to be transparent and above-board with its own behavior.  Anything else would be hypocritical and unfair.

  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity, Tax
  • Blog:
    Dollars & Sense
  • Organization:
    Gray Reed & McGraw LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo