Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

More Singleton Doe Cases in Oregon

By Benjamin Justus on September 8, 2014
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The owners to the rights to the acclaimed film Dallas Buyers Club are back in Oregon U.S. District Court with a batch of “singleton” lawsuits against Doe parties, alleging both federal Copyright Act and Oregon State Trademark violations.

As Troll Defense earlier reported, Voltage Pictures, LLC teamed with another production company to bring combination copyright-trademark suits based on The Company You Keep.

This time, joining Voltage as co-plaintiff is Dallas Buyers Club, LLC, the purported owner of copyrights to the award-winning film.   The new Oregon cases combine the copyright infringement claims of Dallas Buyers Club, LLC with the claims of Voltage for violations of the Oregon Trademark Act, ORS 647.

The new copyright claims contain an “ALTERNATE THEORY – INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT,” which alleges that “Defendant obtained Internet access through an ISP and permitted, facilitated and promoted the use of the Internet access for the infringing of DBC’s exclusive rights under The Copyright Act by others.”  The complaints also contain some factual allegations which appear intended to account for the fact that investigations of BitTorrent activities often do not reveal who the individual BitTorrent user may be.  For example, it is alleged that:

20. Defendant’s IP address has been observed as associated with the peer-to-peer exchange of hundreds of copyrighted titles through the BitTorrent network, a record of which can be filed with the Court on request.

21. The volume and titles of the activity associated with defendant’s IP address indicates that the defendant is likely the primary subscriber of the IP address or someone who resides with the subscriber, as such activity indicates the defendant is an authorized user of the IP address with permissive access.

22. The volume of the activity associated with defendant’s IP address indicates that anyone using or observing activity on the IP address would likely be aware of the conduct of the defendant.

23. The volume and titles of the activity associated with defendant’s IP address indicates that the defendant is not a young child, but an adult with mature tastes.

The known case captions (with links to complaints) are as follows:

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Doe-50.186.3.248, Case No. 6:14-cv-1405

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Doe-24.22.71.110, Case No. 6:14-cv-1406

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Doe-67.189.16.171, Case No. 3:14-cv-1407

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Doe-98.232.236.10, Case No. 6:14-cv-1408

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Doe-74.92.171.141, Case No. 3:14-cv-1409

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Troll Defense
  • Organization:
    Lybeck Pedreira & Justus
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo