Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Choosing the Parameters of the Data Library

By Kirk Jenkins on January 20, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

9990024683_a37089e13d_zWe begin our analysis by selecting the parameters of the data library.  Since this research is intended primarily as a tool for civil appellate practice in full-service firms like mine, we limit the scope of the cases we study in order to ensure that trends elsewhere in the law do not obscure the Court’s decision-making in the areas of the law we are interested in.  We begin by excluding all criminal cases, as well as matters which are only technically civil, such as habeas corpus cases and civil commitments.  We also exclude all attorney disciplinary matters and juvenile cases; such practices tend to be pursued by subject-matter specialists (and not by large law firms engaged in a general civil practice.)  We focus on the period of 2000 through the present simply because gaps begin to appear in the data available online once we reach the late 1990s.  Our chosen period of study encompasses the entire career on the Illinois Supreme Court of every current Justice but one – Justice Charles E. Freeman.

The result is a data library of 620 civil cases decided between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2014.  These opinions were reviewed and coded for forty-eight different data points:

Table_1_A

Table_1_B

The following Justices are included for all or part of their tenures.[1]  The Justices are arranged in the Table by individual seats on the Court, showing each Justice’s replacement as he or she left the Court, and therefore the philosophical evolution of the Court during the period of our study.  We also include the political party identification of each Justice (in Illinois, Justices must seek election and retention in partisan elections):

Table_2

The Illinois Supreme Court has been closely divided by party identification throughout our period of study.  The Court’s Republican wing lost one member in 2000 with the election of Democrat Thomas L. Kilbride, shifting the balance from four Democrats and three Republicans to five Democrats and two Republicans.  The party balance remained there for four years until late 2004, when Republican Lloyd A. Karmeier replaced Democrat Phillip J. Rarick, and the Court has been split 4-3 ever since.

Image courtesy of Flickr by rh2ox (no changes).


[1]               The Illinois Constitution provides that the Chief Justice is selected by the members of the Court to serve a single three year term.  Six members of the Court have served as Chief Justice during some portion of the period we study – Justices Harrison, McMorrow, Thomas, Fitzgerald, Kilbride and Garman.  We refer to each as “Chief Justice” when discussing the period of his or her tenure, and as “Justice” at all other times.

Photo of Kirk Jenkins Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with…

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

Read more about Kirk JenkinsEmailKirk's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Appellate and Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    Illinois Supreme Court Review
  • Organization:
    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo