Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Construction Defect Bill Dies in Committee

By Jim Johnson on April 28, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last night, the democrat-controlled Colorado House State Veterans and Military Affairs Committee voted along party lines to kill Senate Bill 177.  Despite support from both sides of the aisle, including the Metro Mayors Caucus, developers and affordable housing advocates, the bill was unable to garner sufficient support to get it out of committee and onto the House floor, where supporters claimed it had the votes to pass. Supporters largely blamed the trial lawyers for the bill’s failure.

The bill was intended to help spur condominium development in Colorado, which has dropped to historic lows in recent years. It would have done so by requiring that a majority of condominium owners in a project consent to filing class-action construction defect lawsuits, whereas the current law requires only a majority of the board of the homeowners’ association to do so. The bill would have also limited a homeowners’ association’s ability to amend its declaration to eliminate a mandatory arbitration clause.

Debate over the bill centered on whether the lack of condominium development in Colorado was a function of the prevalence of lawsuits against condominium developers or the lack of a market for such units. Ultimately, the vote seemed to come down to whether a homeowner’s right to address construction defects should be limited, and whether the bill would increase the construction of additional affordable housing units.

Photo of Jim Johnson Jim Johnson

Jim Johnson assists real estate owners and developers in complex land use and development matters, including disputes regarding entitlement approvals and eminent domain. As part of Jim’s practice, he often represents clients in the acquisition of real property, in securing annexation, zoning, subdivision…

Jim Johnson assists real estate owners and developers in complex land use and development matters, including disputes regarding entitlement approvals and eminent domain. As part of Jim’s practice, he often represents clients in the acquisition of real property, in securing annexation, zoning, subdivision or other local governmental approvals and in the negotiation of construction and design contracts. Jim’s litigation practice includes representing land owners in Rule 106 actions challenging local government decisions surrounding annexation, zoning and subdivision issues. Jim also represents land owners facing the threat of eminent domain, in pre-condemnation planning, valuation issues and condemnation proceedings.

Read more about Jim JohnsonEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Rocky Mountain Real Estate Law
  • Organization:
    Otten Johnson Robinson Neff + Ragonetti PC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo