Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Firms Could Face Stiff Penalties for Failing to Follow Recall Orders to a Tee

By Chalana Williams on May 19, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released draft guidance on its mandatory recall authority; in doing so, FDA elaborated on its authority to issue user fees. Food retailers and manufacturers should take note that in the event FDA determines that there is: (1) a reasonable probability that a food product is misbranded and/or adulterated and (2) there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to such food would cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals, the products may not only be removed from store shelves but the firm may also find itself facing stiff penalties for non-compliance. The draft guidance explains that FDA may collect fees in not only the event that a responsible party of a domestic facility or importer fails to issue an ordered recall, but also for failing to recall the food product in the precise manner specified in the order or for failing to provide FDA with requested information.

For additional information, please click here to read our full alert.

Photo of Chalana Williams Chalana Williams

Chalana Williams is an associate in the firm’s Antitrust and Advertising & Product Risk Management groups. Chalana provides litigation and counseling services with a focus on consumer protection matters, as well as the substantiation and defense of advertising claims. She counsels clients on…

Chalana Williams is an associate in the firm’s Antitrust and Advertising & Product Risk Management groups. Chalana provides litigation and counseling services with a focus on consumer protection matters, as well as the substantiation and defense of advertising claims. She counsels clients on compliance with statutes and regulations enforced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Federal Trade Commission. Chalana also has experience assisting both challengers and advertisers in disputes before the National Advertising Division (NAD). Her antitrust practice includes representing clients in inquiries by the Department of Justice and Federal Communications Commission, as well as representing clients seeking to recover damages in private antitrust litigation.

Read more about Chalana WilliamsEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo