Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Southampton Trustees’ Jurisdiction Erodes

By John C. Armentano on June 1, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

sandcastlesLike waves hitting a sandcastle, the Appellate Division, Second Department, dealt a serious blow to the perceived authority and jurisdictional reach of the Southampton Town Trustees in three recent decisions, (Semlear v. Incorporated Village of Quogue, 2015 NY Slip Op 03345 (April 22, 2015), Semlear v. Albert Marine Construction, 2015  NY Slip Op 03344 (April 22, 2015) and Incorporated Village of West Hampton Dunes v. Semlear, 2015 NY Slip Op 03325 (April 22, 2015).

In suits against the Village of Quogue and Albert Marine Construction, the Trustees sought to enjoin the defendants from placing structures along the shoreline without a Trustee permit.  The Trustees contended that the installation of shoreline protection structures violated their right to regulate such activities along ocean beaches of the Town.  Around the same time, the Village of West Hampton Dunes also filed a suit against the Trustees, seeking a declaration that the Trustees have no regulatory authority in the Village or along its waterfront.

Dealing squarely with the subject matter of the Trustees’ regulatory jurisdiction, the Court held in all three decisions that the Trustees have no lawful power to grant or deny permits in connection with development, construction, or use of shore hardening structures anywhere within the ocean beach areas of the incorporated villages of Quogue and West Hampton Dunes.  Relying on two acts passed by the State Legislature in 1818 and 1831, the judges declared that the Trustees could only regulate enumerated activities stated in those acts such as collecting natural resources like seaweed and fish from the shoreline and nothing more.  The Court went on to state that “any attempt” to exercise such power over the ocean beaches within these villages is “null and void”.

Although the Trustees have long defended their right to regulate structures and activities along the shoreline by virtue of the 1686 Dongan Patent, these three decisions drastically erode their authority in the incorporated villages of the Town of Southampton.   The ripple effects of these cases will likely impact how property owners go about protecting their waterfront homes in the Town of Southampton and incorporated villages located within its boundaries.

Photo of John C. Armentano John C. Armentano

John C. Armentano is a land use and municipal law attorney advising developers and owners across all aspects of zoning, land use, State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and environmental rules and regulations. His broad experience with cities, towns, and villages includes land…

John C. Armentano is a land use and municipal law attorney advising developers and owners across all aspects of zoning, land use, State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and environmental rules and regulations. His broad experience with cities, towns, and villages includes land use and municipal litigation, including adverse possession, easement rights, riparian rights, wetland regulations, and other commercial litigation matters at both the trial and appellate levels.

Read more about John C. ArmentanoEmailJohn C.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Long Island Land Use and Zoning
  • Organization:
    Farrell Fritz, P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo