Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

BIS and DDTC Propose New Rules to Harmonise EAR and ITAR Definitions

By Trade Practitioner on July 1, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Globe with pinsOn 3 June 2015, the US Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and Department of State’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) published companion announcements in the Federal Register of proposed revisions to key terms in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). The proposed rules, if adopted, would harmonize definitions of important concepts used in both sets of regulations, including “technology” and “technical data,” “required,” “peculiarly responsible,” “proscribed person,” “published,” results of “fundamental research,” “public domain,” “export,” “reexport,” “release,” “transfer” and “transfer (in-country).” Each agency published on its website a side-by-side comparison of the relevant regulatory text from both the EAR and ITAR. In addition, the proposed rules include measures to clarify existing controls in the EAR and ITAR on electronically transmitted and stored technology and software secured using end-to-end encryption, and the scope of “defense services” under the ITAR. BIS and DDTC will accept comments on the proposed rules until 3 August 2015.

  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    The Trade Practitioner
  • Organization:
    Squire Patton Boggs
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo