Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The CFPB Details Recent Supervisory Activities Regarding Mortgage Servicing

By Debra Lewis & Gregory C. Cook on September 11, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently published the eighth edition of its Supervisory Highlights, in which the Bureau “shares recent supervisory observations” touching on several legal topics under its jurisdiction. One of the principal areas covered in this edition is mortgage servicing. Ensuring compliance with the CFPB mortgage servicing rules that went into effect on January 10, 2014 has been a “high priority” for the Bureau. The Supervisory Highlights details mortgage servicer violations in the areas of loss mitigation, foreclosure, periodic statement disclosures, and the Homeowners Protection Act.

Loss Mitigation

Under Regulation X, a borrower in default may submit a loss mitigation application to the mortgage servicer in hopes of avoiding foreclosure. The mortgage servicer is required to notify the borrower within five days that it has received the application, and provide a list of any additional documents or information that may be required. CFPB examiners noted multiple violations of this rule. Mortgage servicers were cited for failing to send borrowers timely notice acknowledging receipt of a loss mitigation application, and requesting unnecessary or duplicative documents from borrowers. Servicers were also cited for misrepresenting the terms of a loan deferment plan, and for failing to honor a trial modification after the loan had been transferred. The Bureau noted that it was paying close attention to “the risks inherent in transferring loans in loss mitigation, including the risk that information is not accurately transferred between servicers.”

Foreclosure

Mortgage servicers were cited for sending foreclosure notices to borrowers who were current on their loans, or who had already been approved for a loss mitigation plan.

Periodic Statement Disclosures

Servicers were cited for failing to send periodic mortgage statements, or sending statements with incomplete or inaccurate transaction histories, in violation of Regulation Z. In certain cases, the problems were caused by software limitations or glitches.

Homeowners Protection Act

Servicers were cited for failing to automatically cancel private mortgage insurance after the borrower’s mortgage balance reached 78% of the original property value, as required by the Homeowners Protection Act.

The CFPB mortgage servicing rules can be complex, even for experienced servicers. To help ensure compliance, and to limit liability for potential violations, a mortgage servicer should consider the following:

  • Written policies, training, audits. As the Supervisory Highlights make clear, the CFPB expects mortgage servicers to develop written policies and procedures consistent with the mortgage servicing rules. In addition, the Bureau expects servicers to train their employees to follow the policies and procedures, and to conduct regular audits to help ensure compliance.
  • Computer systems. Software limitations or failures will not excuse a mortgage servicer from failing to comply with the mortgage servicing rules. Servicers should thoroughly vet third party vendors and products, and should audit IT systems regularly.
  • Corrections and Self-Reporting. If a systemic violation is discovered, fix it immediately. A mortgage servicer may also want to self-report a large-scale violation. The CFPB, as with most regulators, tends to be more lenient on companies that promptly remedy and self-report violations. This is true regardless of whether the violation is handled by the Supervision Office or results in an enforcement action. Of course, counsel should be consulted promptly after a violation is discovered.

Photo of Debra Lewis Debra Lewis
Email
Photo of Gregory C. Cook Gregory C. Cook

Gregory is a partner in Balch & Bingham’s Birmingham office and serves as chair of the Financial Services Litigation Practice Group.  His practice centers on commercial litigation, with a concentration on complex litigation. Since joining Balch & Bingham LLP in 1991, Mr. Cook…

Gregory is a partner in Balch & Bingham’s Birmingham office and serves as chair of the Financial Services Litigation Practice Group.  His practice centers on commercial litigation, with a concentration on complex litigation. Since joining Balch & Bingham LLP in 1991, Mr. Cook has focused his practice in the area of business and financial services litigation, including concentrating on class action defense (he has been involved in defending over 60 class actions). More recently, Mr. Cook has defended a number of actions and class actions arising out of the mortgage and subprime crisis, including matters for loan servicers, lenders, title insurance agents and settlement services providers. Mr. Cook is listed in Best Lawyers in commercial litigation, has been rated “AV” by Martindale Hubbell and was selected by Super Lawyers in Business Litigation.

Read more about Gregory C. CookEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Southeast Financial Litigation Monitor
  • Organization:
    Balch & Bingham LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo