Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Fallout for the “Made in Germany” Brand

By David Pabian on October 8, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Power of German Engineering

The “Made in Germany” brand has undoubtedly taken a hit in the past few weeks. The brand, along with the phrases “German engineering”, “German engineered”, etc. have made their way into just about every advertisement for goods coming from German companies. Volkswagen made the theme part of its advertising campaign, perhaps more than any other company. It has come to signify quality, precision, and attention to detail (despite its origins as a tag of inferiority in late 19th century England). But what will the fallout be for all of those other German producers when one of the most high profile German companies takes the qualities the German brand is built on and focuses them towards cheating their customers, the public, and numerous national governments?

Pretuned in Deutschland

German Engineering on Board

The bulk of the German economy is made up of Mittelstand, or small to medium sized companies. These are not Volkswagen, Bayer, Adidas, or Deutsche Bank (which has received special funding deals from the capital markets because investors think it is the Bundesbank, talk about what’s in a name), but generally small, closely held companies that focus on doing one thing very well. Most often they make specialty tools or parts that are largely invisible to consumers so they don’t need to worry too much about how they view a mark. They invest for the long term and spend a great deal of energy building personal relationships and reputations for quality with their customers. So a knock to the German brand may not affect them too much in the short term (except for those working with Volkswagen) but could affect their ability to attract new business.

Made in Germany Stamp

Policing a brand is difficult. Mark owners spend considerable energy ensuring their vendors, franchisees, etc. adhere to standards of use, service, and production to prevent a weakening of the mark and, ideally, create a brand known for a certain quality. But how do you police a brand when that brand is an entire country? Moreover, the brand is not held by a single stakeholder, but rather by the German people. Much will depend on the response of the German public, government, and other German companies. All have been quick to condemn Volkswagen, but people are eyeing the other German car makers, as well as the other major auto industry players. With Germany in a leadership role in Europe, and increasingly globally, it may not be enough that every car maker was doing it if the other German brands get sucked in.

Perhaps this is why the emissions scandal seems to have generated so much more news and backlash than General Motors ignition switch problems or Toyota’s “sticky” gas pedals. Both of those resulted in a number of deaths directly attributable the problem and the company’s decision not to recall. The emissions cheating may have resulted in deaths, but in an abstract way in which it is impossible to connect the death of any individual directly to Volkswagen’s additional emissions. It seems to me that putting a name and face to an actual casualty tends to whip up anger more than scientific reports and estimates that are unreadable to most. Maybe we expect cold calculations regarding product recalls but don’t expect the company to outright cheat? Maybe indifference is bad but lying is worse? Or maybe Volkswagen represents Germany in a way that General Motors and Toyota don’t represent the United States and Japan.

David Pabian

View my professional biography

An interest in technology and a tendency toward early adoption led me to write a book on the iPhone 3G shortly after graduating from college. I then spent two years in Spain teaching at a public bilingual grade school.

View my professional biography

An interest in technology and a tendency toward early adoption led me to write a book on the iPhone 3G shortly after graduating from college. I then spent two years in Spain teaching at a public bilingual grade school. While living abroad, I noticed the stark difference in advertising and branding from country to country, more greatly appreciating the importance of the likes and cultural norms of an audience. My interest in technology then steered me towards a job with a web based data management company in Chicago. While there I began to appreciate the how law and technology interact with market forces.

Law school was a natural next step for me and I soon moved up to Minneapolis to attend the University of Minnesota Law School. While there I organized a symposium on how international law has developed to take the internet account. The symposium focused on the data security, privacy, and speech implications of new national and international legal regimes.

In my free time I enjoy cooking, biking, and music. When I’m able to take enough time off, I’m often traveling nationally and internationally, or camping (the Boundary Waters in May before all the crowds is my personal favorite).

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    DuetsBlog
  • Organization:
    Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo