Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

EPA Proposes CSAPR Update Rule Requiring Additional NOx Reductions in 23 States

Blue Sky
By Andrew N. Sawula, Bina Joshi & David M. Loring on December 1, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On November 16, 2015, the United States EPA proposed updates to the Cross State Air Pollution Rule. These updates would require more stringent nitrogen oxide reductions from power plants in 23 states. EPA also proposes to address nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide requirements for 11 states whose original reduction requirements were remanded to EPA following recent court actions.

The Cross State Air Pollution Rule, better known as CSAPR, was originally promulgated in 2011 to force certain states to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxide (NOx) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) from power plants. EPA now proposes to update CSAPR to require 23 upwind states to further reduce ozone season NOx emissions, beginning in 2017, to ensure that downwind states can comply with the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone of 75 parts per billion (ppb).

NOx chemically reacts with volatile organic compounds in the presence of sunlight to create ground-level ozone. That reaction is most significant during the summer months, known as the ozone season. EPA proposes to impose federal implementation plans on states that do not have approved state implementation plans addressing the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the date that the CSAPR Update Rule goes into effect. In addition, EPA’s proposal attempts to address NOx budgets for 11 states whose budgets were remanded to EPA by a 2015 D.C. Circuit order, following a successful appeal of those budgets to the Supreme Court.

Further reductions may be required in the coming years. EPA recently promulgated a new and more stringent ozone NAAQS of 70 ppb, which is scheduled to go into effect on December 28, 2015. That standard is currently under review by the D.C. Circuit and is not addressed in this proposed rule. If and when that standard goes into effect, we can expect that EPA will propose another CSAPR update to further ratchet down emissions.

EPA will accept comments for 45 days after the proposed rule is published in the Federal Register. As of the time of this post, the rule has not been published. A public hearing for the proposed rule will be held on December 17, 2015 in Washington, DC. A pre-publication version of the rule can be viewed here.

Photo of Andrew N. Sawula Andrew N. Sawula

Andy Sawula relies on his wide range of experience and broad perspective to guide clients through the often complex maze of environmental and natural resources laws.

Read more about Andrew N. SawulaEmail
Photo of Bina Joshi Bina Joshi

Bina Joshi practices environmental law. Bina’s experience includes helping clients with all aspects of environmental litigation matters including issues arising under the Clean Air Act, CERCLA and related state laws. She regularly helps clients with compliance matters, both in dealing with compliance issues…

Bina Joshi practices environmental law. Bina’s experience includes helping clients with all aspects of environmental litigation matters including issues arising under the Clean Air Act, CERCLA and related state laws. She regularly helps clients with compliance matters, both in dealing with compliance issues as they arise, and helping to develop compliance programs and engage in future compliance planning. Her experience also includes representing clients in remediation matters under state and federal remediation programs. Additionally, Bina regularly helps clients respond to government requests for information, including under Section 114 of the Clean Air Act and Section 104(e) of CERCLA.

Read more about Bina JoshiEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of David M. Loring David M. Loring

David M. Loring concentrates his practice in all areas of environmental law. He has counseled and represented electric generating and large industrial clients on a variety of federal, state and administrative litigation and regulatory matters.

Read more about David M. LoringEmail
  • Posted in:
    Energy, Environmental
  • Blog:
    Energy & Environmental Law Adviser
  • Organization:
    ArentFox Schiff LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Pro Policyholder
  • The Way on FDA
  • Crypto Digest
  • Inside Cybersecurity & Privacy Law
  • La Oficina Legal Ayala Hernández
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo