Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Variable Annuities Are Retirement Investment Product of Interest in SEC’s 2016 Examination Priorities

By Cheryl Haas on January 13, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As we discussed yesterday, thLamp and looking glass #24e Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) released its examination priorities for 2016 on January 11 (the “Examination Priorities”). Retirement investments continue to be an area of focus for OCIE as we march into the new year. Digging deeper into this area, OCIE identified variable annuities as a retirement product warranting special attention.

Variable annuities have become a popular component of retirement plans. Retirement investors are attracted to variable annuities because many variable annuities offer guaranteed income for life. The popularity and prominence of variable annuities have grown as employers have moved away from defined benefit plans toward defined contribution plans, a point highlighted by OCIE in its Examination Priorities. OCIE cited statistics showing that investors have twice as much money invested in defined contribution plans, as they do in defined benefit plans. Variable annuities often fill the gap created by the decline in defined benefit plans and provide peace of mind to investors that they will not outlive their retirement savings.

The shift toward defined contribution plans, and the attendant emergence of variable annuities, means that investors now bear more risk than ever when investing for their retirement. OCIE noted in its Examination Priorities that “the financial services industry is offering a broad array of information, advice, products, and services to retail investors to help them plan for, and live in, their retirement years.” OCIE plans to implement initiatives to assess the risks that variable annuities pose to investors. OCIE stated that it would assess three facets of variable annuities: (1) the suitability of sales to investors, (2) the adequacy of disclosures and (3) the supervision of variable annuity sales.

OCIE’s ReTIRE initiative, rolled out in July 2015, provides further insight into what OCIE may look for when conducting examinations of registrants selling variable annuities. The ReTIRE initiative focuses on the reasonable basis for recommendations, conflicts of interest, supervision and compliance controls, and marketing and disclosure practices. Registrants that sell variable annuities should therefore be prepared to provide information and respond to inquiries regarding, inter alia:

  • the process for recommending variable annuities to customers;
  • the due diligence performed around investment options;
  • compensation provided to incent representatives to recommend variable annuities;
  • implementation and compliance with controls, oversight and supervisory policies regarding the sale of variable annuities; and
  • the content and accuracy of marketing materials.

When OCIE rolled out the ReTIRE initiative, it encouraged registrants “to reflect upon their own practices, policies, and procedures in these areas to promote improvements in their supervisory, oversight, and compliance programs, as deemed appropriate.” In light of OCIE including variable annuities in its 2016 Examination Priorities, registrants that offer variable annuities should pay special heed to this advice.

Registrants that offer variable annuities and are subject to FINRA oversight should also be aware that FINRA made sales practices of variable annuities an examination priority in 2015. OCIE’s focus mirrors FINRA’s from last year. Just as OCIE has in its 2016 Examination Priorities, FINRA focused on “compensation structures that may improperly incent the sale of variable annuities, the suitability of recommendations, statements made by registered representatives about these products and the adequacy of disclosures made about material features of variable annuities.”

Photo of Cheryl Haas Cheryl Haas

Cheryl is go-to litigation counsel for Fortune 100 companies, investment companies and advisers, broker-dealers and private individuals in high-stakes disputes in federal and state courts and a variety of arbitration forum as well as before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial…

Cheryl is go-to litigation counsel for Fortune 100 companies, investment companies and advisers, broker-dealers and private individuals in high-stakes disputes in federal and state courts and a variety of arbitration forum as well as before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and state securities regulators across the United States.

Read more about Cheryl HaasEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Subject to Inquiry
  • Organization:
    McGuireWoods LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo