Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Study on Governing Law & Jurisdictional Choices in Cross-Border Transactions in Asia

By Jonathan Leach & Stephanie Khan on January 20, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On 11 January 2016, the Singapore Academy of Law’s International Promotion of Singapore Law Committee (“SAL’s IPSL Committee”) released the results of an independent study on governing law and jurisdictional choices in cross-border transactions.

The participants

500 legal practitioners and in-house counsel who deal with cross-border transactions in Singapore and the Asia region were surveyed.

Summary of results

Preferred dispute resolution method overall: arbitration (71% of participants).

Preferred dispute resolution method by industry sector: for construction disputes: 84% for arbitration and 12% for litigation; for shipping and transport disputes: 77% for arbitration and 19% for litigation.

Most common reason given for choosing arbitration: enforceability (46%); confidentiality (17%), fairness (12%).

Preferred dispute resolution venue: Singapore (52%), followed by Hong Kong (22%).

Preferred governing law: English law (48%), followed by Singapore law (25%).

  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    ARBlog
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo