Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

NARB Recommends Discontinuing Advertising Claims

By Phyllis H. Marcus & Emma Lewis on January 28, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On January 27, 2016, the National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) went after dietary supplements, recommending that Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. (“Novartis”) discontinue advertising claims that its supplement Benefiber “Helps Maintain Regularity.” The case was originally brought before the National Advertising Division (“NAD”) by a competitor claim from Proctor & Gamble Co., which argued that the fiber contained in Benefiber, wheat dextrin, is not clinically proven to promote regularity. After NAD recommended Novartis discontinue the claim, Novartis appealed to NARB, providing short descriptions of two Japanese studies on dietary fiber and health. The NARB panel found Novartis’s evidence insufficient, particularly in light of other studies done that tested wheat dextrin in doses similar to those found in Benefiber. Those previous studies showed no meaningful impact on regularity. Novartis responded to NARB’s recommendation by stating that it respectfully disagrees with the panel’s decision, but will discontinue the advertising.

  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade, Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Hunton Retail Law Resource
  • Organization:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo