Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Utah Passes Bill Regulating Non-Competes

By Matt Durham on March 10, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

After heated debate between legislators and among the business community, the Utah state legislature has passed HB 251, the Post-Employment Restrictions Act.  As passed, the Act prohibits “post-employment restrictive covenants” with restrictive periods longer than one year.  The Act defines a “post-employment restrictive covenant” (also identified in the statute as a “covenant not to compete” or “non compete agreement”) as

an agreement, written or oral, between an employer and employee under which the employee agrees that the employee, either alone or as an employee of another person, will not compete with the employer in providing products, processes, or services that are similar to the employer’s products, processes, or services.

The Act prohibits employers and employees from entering into post-employment restrictive covenants of more than one year and declares such agreements void.  The Act specifically requires that non-competition must comply with other requirements for enforceability that have developed under common law.  Finally, the Act provides that employers who unsuccessfully attempt to enforce such agreements are liable for actual damages, court or arbitration costs, and attorney fees.

The Act contains express carve-outs for confidentiality agreements, non-solicitation agreements, severance agreements, and non-compete agreements in exchange for value given in connection with the sale of a business.  The new law applies to non-competition agreements entered into on or after May 10, 2016.  The Act as passed does not include some provisions that had been included in earlier versions of the bill.  It does not, for example, require specific additional consideration to be provided for non-competition agreements.  Nor does it contain the provision making non-competition agreements inapplicable to ordinary, rank-and-file employees in a “common calling.”

Non-competition agreements have been widely used by Utah employers to protect their business relationships, investment in employee training, and good will.  Any business with 20 or more Utah employees should ensure that any non-competition agreements it enters into in the future complies with the new law.  A business should also carefully consider attempts to enforce such agreements.

 

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    World of Employment
  • Organization:
    Stoel Rives LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo