Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Mandatory Union Fees Preserved By Supreme Court’s Deadlock

By Nelson Cary & Natalie McLaughlin on March 29, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Today the Supreme Court issued a decision in the closely watched case of Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which keeps mandatory union fees for public employees alive.  In a one-sentence opinion, an equally divided Supreme Court simply affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in favor of charging school teachers mandatory union fees.  The decision doesn’t apply to compulsory union membership in the private sector.

The Ninth Circuit based its brief decision on the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education. Abood allows public employers to require all employees – both union and nonunion members – to pay union fees, so long as workers are not forced to pay a portion of the fees that covers political or ideological activities.

Following oral arguments on January 11, 2016, many predicted the Supreme Court would issue a 5-4 opinion against mandatory union fees for public employees, overturning the Abood precedent.  Justice Antonin Scalia’s questions appeared to indicate that he sided with the challengers.  With Justice Scalia’s passing, however, the justices emerged in a 4-4 deadlock.

The case was a very important one for organized labor.  In light of the split decision, it is likely this issue will arise again.  This opinion makes clear that the outcome will depend on the new justice.

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Vorys on Labor
  • Organization:
    Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo