Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Branding 101: Trademark Audit – Using your marks consistently (why you need a trademark style guide)

By Kathy Rheintgen on May 5, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

We have discussed the need to use your trademarks as adjectives and not nouns or verbs to avoid having them becoming descriptive or even generic terms. A good quick test to see if you are using the mark correctly is to remove the mark from the sentence and see if it still makes sense. If you still have a functional sentence, you are using the mark correctly. So, “Buy XYZ surgical equipment, it will make your day easier” still makes sense without the mark: “Buy surgical equipment, it will make your day easier.” However “Buy XYZ, it will make your day easier” makes no sense without the mark: “Buy, it will make your day easier.”

Today we will talk about how you should also be using your trademarks in a prominent and consistent manner.

Trademarks help consumers identify and distinguish your goods or services from those of your competitor. You should be using your marks in a way that builds “brand awareness” so that consumers will see your mark and immediately think of your company. If the appearance of your trademark is different every time a consumer sees it, it will take longer to build up a good strong association between the mark and your goods and services. And, with less distinctive marks, inconsistent use may undermine your rights completely.

Consistent use of a mark will help strengthen your rights in that mark as well as in any registrations that you may have. Consistency in use is particularly important with descriptive or highly suggestive marks and will help consumers to make the link between the mark and your company; it will help create secondary meaning.

After a mark is chosen, you then need to decide how the mark will be used so that it will stand out from the remaining text on the page and be distinguishable from other marks in the marketplace. These decisions should be standardized and set out in a Style or Usage Guide (to be discussed in more detail in a later post). The types of decisions that need to be made include:

  • Will the mark can be bolded or used in ALL CAPS or with First Initial Caps or a COMBINATION so the The Mark stands out from the remainder of the ad.
  • Special FONTS can also be used as well as COLOR. 
  • Other important decisions regarding how to use your mark include: will the mark be used as one word (CalmCap) or two words (Calm Cap)?
  • Will traditional spelling be used or something different (KalmKap)?

You should not use KalmKap one time and then kalmkap another. Having said that, it is acceptable to use a color mark in black and white where the specific color is not available – KalmKap.

Similarly, if your chosen font is not available (for example in a news piece about the product or service) the mark should be used in the standard font of the ad.  However, in that case the mark should be placed in “quotation mark” or the TM or ® symbol used to identify the mark as a mark “KalmKap” or KalmKap ® or KalmKap TM.

The same is true for logos – color and style matters. McDonald’s restaurants use the famous “Golden Arches” logo. It would be confusing and detrimental to overall brand strength if random McDonald’s restaurant ads or stores used blue arches.

Our Insight. Your Advantage. Consistent use of a company’s trademarks requires that a set of proper branding guidelines be developed and followed. The best way to be sure this is done is to create a Trademark Usage Manual or a Style Guide that can be referred to anytime an ad is being developed or placed to be sure that your mark appears as it should.  Next week we will look more closely at development of such a guide.

Photo of Kathy Rheintgen Kathy Rheintgen

Kathy’s intellectual property litigation experience includes managing pharmaceutical, as well as mechanical, patent cases in a variety of trademark and copyright infringement matters and trade secret and antitrust matters. She also has experience in writing infringement opinions for patent, trademark and copyright cases.

Read more about Kathy RheintgenEmail
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Law Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo