Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Drone experts say human and machine should be treated the same when it comes to privacy and security

By Kathryn Rattigan on June 16, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last week I attended the International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) in Arlington, Virginia. An “Ethics and Engineering” panel set forth some interesting questions for those individuals and businesses interested in becoming part of the drone community. However, as more and more drones hit the skies, more and more privacy and security concerns arise. To bridge that gap, a speaker at the conference from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) suggested using the ‘privacy by design’ concept (i.e.,  ‘an approach to protecting privacy by embedding it into the design specifications of technologies, business practices, and physical infrastructures. That means building in privacy up front—right into the design specifications and architecture of new systems and processes). Creating drones and UAS that have the ability to create audit logs (e.g. who viewed video/photos from the drone and how many times they viewed it), automatically blur individual faces (e.g. geological surveying recognizing individual people is irrelevant to the mission), use real-time destruction of frames with individuals in the frames), and built in geo fencing hardwired into the technology, will help to alleviate some of the privacy and security concerns associated with drone operations. Moreover, formalized ethics courses to inform engineers about the privacy and security issues is also important.

And why should businesses care about drones and the privacy and security issues related to this technology? Well, there are many non-military uses for UAS–just a short list:

  • Agriculture, fishery, forestry;
  • Audio-visual, media, advertising;
  • Broadcasting and journalism;
  • Cinema industry;
  • Construction and real estate;
  • Environmental (i.e.,  protection, conservation);
  • Heritage and historical monuments;
  • Humanitarian relief;
  • Industrial (commercial and corporate);
  • Insurance (investigations);
  • Maintenance;
  • Mining and exploration;
  • Policy compliance and legal proof;
  • Public safety (i.e.,  animal deterrent, civil protection, disaster management, fire fighting, pubic gatherings, critical installations);
  • Public security and law enforcement (i.e.,  police, border control, coast guard, customs, gamekeeping, judiciary);
  • Research and scientific;
  • Utility companies; and
  • Training and instruction.

We can use UAS to advertise, broadcast, shoot film for movies and television, deter animals on farmland, dispense food and medicine, explore, inspect, map, measure, monitor, observe, patrol, conduct relief flights, research, conduct search and rescue, spray, survey, test, track, and for water bombing. We just want to be sure that we build privacy and security into drones and UAS from the beginning so we can use this technology safely, efficiently and effectively without invading individual privacy rights.

Photo of Kathryn Rattigan Kathryn Rattigan

Kathryn Rattigan is a member of the Business Litigation Group and the Data Privacy+ Cybersecurity Team. She concentrates her practice on privacy and security compliance under both state and federal regulations and advising clients on website and mobile app privacy and security…

Kathryn Rattigan is a member of the Business Litigation Group and the Data Privacy+ Cybersecurity Team. She concentrates her practice on privacy and security compliance under both state and federal regulations and advising clients on website and mobile app privacy and security compliance. Kathryn helps clients review, revise and implement necessary policies and procedures under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). She also provides clients with the information needed to effectively and efficiently handle potential and confirmed data breaches while providing insight into federal regulations and requirements for notification and an assessment under state breach notification laws. Prior to joining the firm, Kathryn was an associate at Nixon Peabody. She earned her J.D., cum laude, from Roger Williams University School of Law and her B.A., magna cum laude, from Stonehill College. She is admitted to practice law in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Read her full rc.com bio here.

Read more about Kathryn RattiganEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider
  • Organization:
    Robinson & Cole LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo