Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

GE Salmon: What’s Really at Steak

By Katia Asche on July 6, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Fresh salmon slices

In April 2016, we posted about the lawsuit brought by environmental food and safety groups, along with fisherman trade associations, to reverse the FDA’s approval of a genetically engineered (GE) salmon. The complaint alleges that the FDA failed to evaluate how the GE salmon will impact the environment and that the farmed salmon will inevitably escape, “interbreed with wild endangered salmon, compete with them for food and space, or pass on infectious disease . . . .”

Last week, AquaBounty Technologies, Inc., the small bioengineering firm that develops the salmon, moved to intervene in the suit. AquaBounty argues that the FDA’s approval was valid. That approval came after decades of research and development and 20 years after AquaBounty’s predecessor, A/F Protein, Inc., first applied to begin the FDA approval process. Since then, the company has worked closely with the FDA throughout its “lengthy and comprehensive expert review” of the GE salmon. AquaBounty estimates that it spent $80 million to bring its product to market. It argues that “[n]o entity is more directly threatened by [Plaintiffs’ lawsuit] than AquaBounty.”

The battle lines over genetically modified foods have been drawn. AquaBounty’s intervention pits a boutique bioengineering firm against independent commercial fishermen. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include the Golden Gate Salmon Association, the Institute for Fisheries Resources, and the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations—advocacy groups for commercial fishermen. A bigger, better, faster-growing farmed salmon could put their constituents out of business, which, in turn, could harm local economies that depend on the wild salmon trade.

The threat to fishermen may be more pressing than any risk that AquaBounty’s GE salmon will escape and contaminate wild fish populations. According to AquaBounty CEO, Dr. Ronald L. Stotish, the company’s salmon are “produced in land-based, fully contained aquaculture systems…subject to multiple and redundant biological and physical containment controls….” And this lawsuit likely will determine AquaBounty’s survival.

Environmental and food safety concerns surrounding GE foods get a lot of attention. But there’s another story here: the struggle between fisherman and bioengineer for control of the salmon market. Certainly the battle over GE foods involves more than the environment and food safety; it’s also about small businesses trying to stay afloat in the ever-changing landscape of food technologies.

Photo of Katia Asche Katia Asche

Katia Asche enjoys finding creative solutions to clients’ legal challenges. She closely follows the ever-changing landscape of product liability and general litigation, focusing her practice on consumer and industrial product liability defense.

Read more about Katia AscheEmail
  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    Product Liability & Mass Torts Blog
  • Organization:
    ArentFox Schiff LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo