Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Personal Guaranties: What? Me Worry?

By Cleve Clinton on August 30, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Franklin, a Senior at Fraternal State, is finally moving off campus to his own apartment with four of his buddies. Before Owen Ohner, the landlord, will approve their lease, he requires a personal guaranty from all the parents. The landlord’s rep Lyn Lackey assures Franklin’s Dad Milton Munney that the guaranty is “standard.” Could this be a problem for Milton?

Yes. The “standard” guaranty that Milton signs almost certainly guarantees his unconditional and absolute payment of the entire debt – whether Franklin’s frat friends and their parents pay or not. Worse yet, a “standard” guaranty waives all tenant defenses or rights of offset against the landlord, meaning Milton would have to pay in full and separately get reimbursement from the other parents. And, if Franklin has any claims against Ohner, they are not offset against Milton’s guaranty. Franklin must sue Ohner separately and then collect his judgment, without any right of offset landlord’s claims under the lease.

Separate Obligations

Under Texas law, the Guaranty and the Lease Agreement are separate undertakings. One who guaranties payment and waives the requirement that the holder of the note exhaust its rights against the maker, (1) becomes an absolute guarantor, (2) is primarily liable, and (3) waives all defenses and any requirement that the landlord first act against the lessees, or, in this case, any other guarantor. As a general rule, an absolute guaranty imposes liability on the guarantor even if the underlying obligation cannot be enforced against the principal.

Because Milton waived all affirmative defenses, he is liable on the guaranty even if the lease is unenforceable against his buddies because of some alleged breach.

Tilting the Scales in Your Favor

A personal guaranty is not likely to be avoided. Milton is better off co-signing the lease as a tenant than as a guarantor. A second option would be to modify the guaranty so that Milton is responsible only for Franklin’s twenty percent share of the lease – which is not likely. If all else fails, at least plan to meet with the parents of Franklin’s friends and talk about their views of the lease and the relative responsibilities of each. Good luck.

Photo of Cleve Clinton Cleve Clinton

I take a holistic approach to solving the real problem at the heart of a crisis. If legal action alone may fall short of the mark, I dig deeper to find the practical solution that will achieve the best outcome.

Read more about Cleve ClintonEmailCleve's Linkedin ProfileCleve's Twitter Profile
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Tilting the Scales
  • Organization:
    Gray Reed & McGraw LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo