Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Tales from Zara: Exchange Rate Allegations

By Mark R. Vowell & Christopher W. Hasbrouck on September 2, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Zara USA, Inc. (“Zara”), the popular European-based fashion retailer which boasts several celebrity clientele, has been targeted in a class action complaint filed in federal court, accused of allegedly carrying out a systematic “bait-and-switch” overpricing scheme. 

According to the complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by Mark Geragos, a well-known Southern California lawyer who represents the plaintiffs, Zara allegedly marked prices for certain goods in Euros, but then charged for the goods in U.S. dollars using greatly inflated exchange rates. The lawsuit is a putative class action, and according to Geragos, the total damages alleged could reach ten figures.

Although Zara is currently the only named defendant in the lawsuit, the complaint also alleges the existence of ten fictitious “Doe” defendants who are alleged to have acted in concert with Zara in its alleged scheme. Accordingly, it is likely that the complaint will be amended to include additional named defendants. Entities doing deals with retail counterparties – from vendors to service providers to commercial landlords – should take note.

  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Hunton Retail Law Resource
  • Organization:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo