Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

IRS Revenue Procedure Confirms IRS Will Respect QTIP Elections When Portability Elections Also Made

By Lisa Roberts-Mamone & Amanda Tate on October 24, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

tax iStock_000006743485_LargeThe IRS resolved an important issue when it issued Revenue Procedure 2016-49, effective September 27, 2016, clarifying that the IRS would not disregard qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) elections for estates that also made a portability election.

Uncertainty over when QTIP elections would be respected arose after the IRS stated in a 2001 Revenue Procedure that unnecessary QTIP elections could be disregarded as null for federal gift, estate and GST tax purposes. Under the 2001 Revenue Procedure, a QTIP election could be deemed unnecessary and ignored if the election was not needed to reduce the estate tax value to zero. For example, where a decedent’s estate was under the applicable exclusion amount, the IRS could disregard a QTIP election made by the estate’s executor or personal representative solely for the purpose of preserving the deceased spouse’s unused exclusion amount under the portability rules.

With Revenue Procedure 2016-49, the IRS put doubts to rest by clarifying that it will respect QTIP elections made by estates whose executors or personal representatives properly made a portability election, regardless of the estate tax value before the QTIP election was made. Revenue Procedure 2016-49 also confirms much of the 2001 Revenue Procedure by detailing the requirements for when a QTIP election will be disregarded, such as when an estate has not made a portability election and the estate tax would be zero without the QTIP election.

It appears that portability is here to stay, and Revenue Procedure 2016-49 should provide relief and clarity to those who plan to utilize both QTIP and portability elections. For more information on how Revenue Procedure 2016-49 could affect your or your family’s estate planning matters, please contact Lisa Roberts-Mamone (lrobertsmamone@bakerlaw.com).

 

Photo of Lisa Roberts-Mamone Lisa Roberts-Mamone
Read more about Lisa Roberts-MamoneEmail
Photo of Amanda Tate Amanda Tate
Email
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    Wealth Director
  • Organization:
    Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo