Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Government Contracts Increasingly Further Labor-Policy Goals

By Albert E. Dotson, Jr. & Eric Singer on January 11, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

0110 Government Contracts Labor PolicyThis past year, the federal government implemented a variety of rules requiring that its contractors meet certain fair-labor requirements.  For example, a federal rule finalized in September requires federal contractors to provide their employees with up to 56 hours of paid sick leave, and another new rule, the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Rule, permits the government to withhold contracts from firms that have violated labor laws.

Similarly, at the local level, new regulations impose greater labor obligations on government contractors than ever before.  For example, in June of this past year, Miami-Dade County adopted the “Employ Miami-Dade Program,” which requires that County construction contractors provide construction-labor employment and training opportunities to Miami-Dade residents.  This new program supplements several existing County fair-labor programs, including those that require its contractors to pay their workers a living wage and provide opportunities to local small businesses.

The trend of requiring government contractors to meet more stringent fair-labor standards coincides with a marked increase in the use of public-private partnerships (P3s), which results in greater private-sector involvement in the provisions of public facilities and services.  Although the benefits of P3s are often framed in terms of reduced costs, shorter time frames, and improved quality, these new regulations highlight that P3s can also be used to further social-policy goals.  The fair-labor requirements that a government contractor must meet, for example, far exceed those ordinarily applicable to the private sector.  Of course, the benefits to the public of these heightened requirements may, in certain situations, be offset by increased costs.  But this tradeoff highlights the flexibility of P3s and their ability to address and balance many different types of public-policy goals.

Photo of Albert E. Dotson, Jr. Albert E. Dotson, Jr.
Read more about Albert E. Dotson, Jr.EmailAl's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Organization:
    Bilzin Sumberg

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo